Grrr, primary derby cover bolts
#41
#43
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Directly above the center of the Earth
Posts: 3,009
Received 1,043 Likes
on
494 Posts
Plain and simple - the guy who put them in put them in too tightly. They're designed to lock *without* loctite or any other stuff. It's why the *SERVICE MANUAL* says to only torque to 40-70 *INCH POUNDS*, or, let your one-year old kid turn the torx driver and done! People who have problems with these bolts like this are those who think they know better than the manual and the spec's it says to use. In the OP's case, the twit who had the bike before him screwed things up.
#44
Plain and simple - the guy who put them in put them in too tightly. They're designed to lock *without* loctite or any other stuff. It's why the *SERVICE MANUAL* says to only torque to 40-70 *INCH POUNDS*, or, let your one-year old kid turn the torx driver and done! People who have problems with these bolts like this are those who think they know better than the manual and the spec's it says to use. In the OP's case, the twit who had the bike before him screwed things up.
Well you are partially correct. That twit, was me. I changed the oil last time. So I am certain I was the one guilty of overtightening them. No loctite here. But no anti-seize either. Honestly I would never have thought to use anti on these bolts. Spark plugs, exhaust bolts, sure. But on a cover like this. No.
Oh well from the sounds of it from others that have had this problem it is the head/washer that is seized and not the threads. Will look better with Chrome allen bolts anyway.
And I believe this time I will dig out the in/lb torgue
#46
Whats weird is the way you described it like a ring put a little smile on my face for some reason.
#47
#48
The following users liked this post:
Death Valley Ultra (07-25-2019)
#49
#50