General Harley Davidson Chat Forum to discuss general Harley Davidson issues, topics, and experiences.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

XIED vs Tuner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 02-16-2018, 07:04 AM
Pine Tree's Avatar
Pine Tree
Pine Tree is offline
MODERATOR

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New England
Posts: 4,106
Received 1,964 Likes on 463 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johnv50
Thanks for all the feedback guys, it seems the tuner is the way to go, only a few bucks more.

thanks again johnv
As been stated before, save your money and pass on the "ied" devices that simply trick your system. They tend to add fuel across the board (read cells) even when some cells would do much better with less fuel.

And all "tuners" are not the same. Do your homework and find out (1) does your bike actually need one, and (2) which tuner is going to provide the necessary changes in the various table to achieve the performance you seek.

Having some knowledge about tuning and tuning devices will pay off huge in the long run.

Good luck!
 
  #12  
Old 02-16-2018, 04:28 PM
gerald martin's Avatar
gerald martin
gerald martin is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: anywhere
Posts: 1,214
Received 450 Likes on 294 Posts
Default

IMO stay stock. Not many people drag race their Harleys. If you stay stock your warranty remains intact. Also in IMO buy the extended warranty, keep your bike stock and you will never have a problem that will not be fixed for $50.00 and when the 7 years are up buy a new bike. A stock Harley can cruise the highway at 80 mph all day long. Do you really need to go faster than that
 
  #13  
Old 02-16-2018, 04:57 PM
lightweight bob's Avatar
lightweight bob
lightweight bob is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Banning, CA
Posts: 1,139
Received 151 Likes on 101 Posts
Default Power Vision

Originally Posted by GregGillette
Avoid cheaping out by going xied/vied. Many of us been down that path only to not be able to solve pinging after a simple stage 1. Fp3 for stage 1, Power Vision if stage 2 or more planned.
+1 here Many of us think we'll just do a little stage one and be done but later down the road we want a little
more - I've done that. If you get a Power Vision from Fuel Moto you be good to go regardless with their support
including maps, second bike expansion ability and neat features like speedo adjustment capability. Not a piggy
but a true ECU software manipulation. It also has a narrow band O2 sensor autotune that works well if you go
small changes at a time - just overlay tunes and save your older one too if you want to go back.
 

Last edited by lightweight bob; 02-16-2018 at 05:11 PM. Reason: O2 sensor tune info
  #14  
Old 02-16-2018, 05:30 PM
T^2's Avatar
T^2
T^2 is online now
Stellar HDF Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,108
Received 1,180 Likes on 732 Posts
Default

XIED's... What?... A couple of resistors configured as a voltage divider? What's the price of the resistors? A couple of dollars? Some wire... Some shrink tube... and the connectors. How much to build a set? They sell for what? $100? Sounds like some nice margin there. Believe they got some new ones now... Adjustable... So what's that - a $3 potentiometer?

I don't know... But they seem to be a crude measure. They work by tricking closed loop bias (an hence only work for the closed loop area of the tables). Normally, narrow band O2 sensors provide an average voltage of ~450mV to essentially indicate stoich. If you voltage divide (assuming its a simple voltage divider) the sensors output the sensor has to produce a higher average output voltage to produce the same 450mV on the voltage divers output (what's seen by the ECM). Generally they target an AFR of 14.0. That requires the input to the voltage divider to average somewhere in the neighborhood of 815mV. That figure is pushing the narrow bands beyond their effective range. They are called narrow bands for a reason. Once you get outside the narrow band effective range, other things besides oxygen content can effect their output.

Another consideration... Back in the day... Older tune calibrations used an AFR of 14.6 not only as a target AFR (the entire closed loop region of the AFR table was set to this figure), but also as a software switch to enable closed loop control. The XIED's assume a starting point of 14.6 to produce an actual AFR of 14.0. Wonder if you have a new calibration where HD expanded the AFR range (~ 14.2 to 15.0) that's closed loop? Say you're in a cell that's set to 14.2. Again, assuming that it's a voltage divider, that would require the XIED voltage divider output to be ~800mV. The required O2 sensor output voltage (average) needed on the input of the voltage divider would push the narrow bands well outside their effective range.

For this - and various other reasons (one already mentioned - they enrich all cells whether it's appropriate for any particular cell or not) - one might be better served looking elsewhere.
 

Last edited by T^2; 02-16-2018 at 05:52 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
99%r
Dyna Glide Models
7
08-25-2013 08:57 AM
Mimo951
Touring Models
31
06-17-2012 10:30 PM
gdhugh
Touring Models
44
10-06-2011 12:20 PM
RSDUDA
Ignition/Tuner/ECM/Fuel Injection
6
03-24-2009 06:31 PM
chiefparry
Touring Models
10
04-08-2008 01:08 PM



Quick Reply: XIED vs Tuner



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 PM.