View Poll Results: After seeing the 2018 Models are you now planning on buying one?
Yes, I like what I see
260
36.41%
No, I don't like any of the new models
454
63.59%
Voters: 714. You may not vote on this poll
After seeing the 2018 line-up, Are you going to buy?
#262
The following users liked this post:
Roadrage1996 (08-24-2017)
#263
The new 2018 softail models are an improvement in performance but they still beg the question why are these bikes so darn heavy?
I understand that a touring model HAS to weigh over 700 lbs (closer to 900 in some cases!)
But an around town bike that weighs 700lbs is just a bit too much especially as I get older and the bikes get harder to push around.
In the looks department I also really don't get the spray can paint jobs and overall cheap look of these models.
And how come there is no Low Rider S with twin discs up front?
Why Harley, why?
For a lot less money you can buy a Triumph T120 Bonneville that weighs almost two hundred pounds less than a Fat Bob.
Plus it will have twin rear shocks easily up gradable to Ohlins.
And twin discs up front.
And gobs of power.
And a cool exhaust note.
Traditionalists that like good looking lighter cruiser bikes that have class should be flocking to the Triumph dealer and trying out either the Bonny or the new Bobber which looks way cool IMHO and has nice ergos and balance which is something Harley lost a long time ago.
Harley just keeps on making big fat heavy bikes even if they DO handle a bit better at this point.
As the Sportster hasn't done anything interesting lately perhaps it is time to look across the pond to a Brit bike?
I understand that a touring model HAS to weigh over 700 lbs (closer to 900 in some cases!)
But an around town bike that weighs 700lbs is just a bit too much especially as I get older and the bikes get harder to push around.
In the looks department I also really don't get the spray can paint jobs and overall cheap look of these models.
And how come there is no Low Rider S with twin discs up front?
Why Harley, why?
For a lot less money you can buy a Triumph T120 Bonneville that weighs almost two hundred pounds less than a Fat Bob.
Plus it will have twin rear shocks easily up gradable to Ohlins.
And twin discs up front.
And gobs of power.
And a cool exhaust note.
Traditionalists that like good looking lighter cruiser bikes that have class should be flocking to the Triumph dealer and trying out either the Bonny or the new Bobber which looks way cool IMHO and has nice ergos and balance which is something Harley lost a long time ago.
Harley just keeps on making big fat heavy bikes even if they DO handle a bit better at this point.
As the Sportster hasn't done anything interesting lately perhaps it is time to look across the pond to a Brit bike?
BMW R1200RT. 600 lbs wet. With top box.
#265
I'm going to my dealership on Saturday to put a deposit on a 114" Fat Bob.
The only downside I can see to it is that bags will be difficult with that exhaust, and the smaller fuel tank. But I'll live with that.
I was going to buy an M8 touring bike this year (RGS or SGS), but with the new frame and the 114" in the Fat Bob that's a game changer for me. I'll add a windshield and a sissy bar with rack for touring until the Touring range get the new frame and the larger motor - hopefully next year...
The only downside I can see to it is that bags will be difficult with that exhaust, and the smaller fuel tank. But I'll live with that.
I was going to buy an M8 touring bike this year (RGS or SGS), but with the new frame and the 114" in the Fat Bob that's a game changer for me. I'll add a windshield and a sissy bar with rack for touring until the Touring range get the new frame and the larger motor - hopefully next year...
That 3.5 gal tank would be a deal breaker for me. That's 50-75 miles less range. It seems like you're looking to do some traveling. Believe me that extra range makes a big difference.
I went from a 3.3 gal tank to a 4.5 gal tank and appreciate the added benefit.
I'd choose a bike with a 5 gal tank if you're buying a 2018 Softail. IMHO of course.
#269