best / most reliable engine from 2001 to 2017
#42
I am waiting on an unmolested 06 Road Glide to be picked up and delivered to me via Haul Bikes. I bought the thing sight unseen thru a dealer auction There's just way too many used bike deals out there. I bought it for less than some dealer markups on new bikes. If it is "as represented" I'll be happy. A good going over once it gets here will be in order. Crazy, I would have never even thought about doing this 10 years ago. Like most, I always wanted the latest and greatest. Now it's the most bang for the buck. At this price, I can have 3 or more different bikes for the price of a new R/G.
The following 2 users liked this post by hellonewman:
Jed Clampett (08-12-2023),
s-glide76 (08-12-2023)
#43
When I was speaking with the seller of the 06 I bought (original owner with all documents and accessories from new) I asked if the bike was a slug being an 88" engine. I had a 103 RK 6 speed in the past so I had my concerns but he said he didn't find it lacking and he was right. I was surprised it didn't seem like a down-grade from the 103 which goes to show how small the incremental improvements are when it comes to a Harley. Riding two up loaded with gear the 103 would shine but thats not what this bike is used for and the 5 speed shifts much better than the 6.
The following users liked this post:
hellonewman (08-12-2023)
#45
Ride around the world twice then service it…
Evo Sporty - real solid daily ride. The 2004 up feature the rubber mount engine and Buell heads. 2007 brought fuel injection and such crisp throttle response.Stage one tune will surprise you as it wakes up the XL. Suspension upgrades are a must. As you age it’s an easy bike to ride, cheap to keep. My 2007 XL1200R a keeper.
I also had a Twin Cam 96” Ultra until last Sunday….early twin cams 88” have had cam chest issues, later twin cams 96” etc - compensators. My TC stranded me when the compensator went taking out my starter clutch at 17000 miles. Put a Baker in and avoided the HD parts - terrible - even the SE comp.
If you want a big twin still the later TC 103’s were much better. That compensator issue though really was a plague on the earlier TC’s.
I also had a Twin Cam 96” Ultra until last Sunday….early twin cams 88” have had cam chest issues, later twin cams 96” etc - compensators. My TC stranded me when the compensator went taking out my starter clutch at 17000 miles. Put a Baker in and avoided the HD parts - terrible - even the SE comp.
If you want a big twin still the later TC 103’s were much better. That compensator issue though really was a plague on the earlier TC’s.
#46
#47
The following users liked this post:
Stiggy (08-13-2023)
#48
The following users liked this post:
Ytcoinshooter (08-14-2023)
#49
For what its worth, here is my experience. Had two Evo's, a 1990 and 1991. No real problems with them. One sold at 39,000 miles, the other at about 43,000 miles. Have a 2014 Twinkie now that I bought new. 47,000 miles now. No oil use, no problem with GPS, compensator or water pump. BUT, the transmission bearings had to be replaced at 43,000 miles - can you believe it! My Toyota Sienna van, why.....it had to have the entire transmission replaced at 33,000 miles. Thank God for Japanese reliability. Right?
#50
For what its worth, here is my experience. Had two Evo's, a 1990 and 1991. No real problems with them. One sold at 39,000 miles, the other at about 43,000 miles. Have a 2014 Twinkie now that I bought new. 47,000 miles now. No oil use, no problem with GPS, compensator or water pump. BUT, the transmission bearings had to be replaced at 43,000 miles - can you believe it! My Toyota Sienna van, why.....it had to have the entire transmission replaced at 33,000 miles. Thank God for Japanese reliability. Right?