Disappointed in new cams!
#21
03-02-2007 | 03:23 AM
Tourer
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 485
Likes: 10
From: East Tennessee
RE: Disappointed in new cams!
[quote]ORIGINAL: DADIBLU
[quote]ORIGINAL: RBJones
Yes, Minton recommends a 95 ci with thinner head gasket to get higher cranking pressure (don't confuse with compression ratio which is related but not the same), which creates more torque at low to mid-range as the ultimate if you're looking for a good all-round rider with gusto. Couple that with a good cam that creates even more torque such as the 21 or 26 Andrews and you should have a nice set-up. The 2-1 is going to be a plus, too.
[quote]ORIGINAL: RBJones
Thanks RBJ. Your right about thepython's. I'm ditching themfor a Rinehart 2-1. I've considered the 26g, but I've seen someposts fromfolks who have them say they feel a loss on the top end. Right now, the torque starts to climb at 2500, peaks at 3500 and starts to roll off at about 4000. I can feel it when passing on the freeway, and it's even worse riding 2up. I'm looking for a build that has good torque all the way across. I saw the 100/100 TC95 on nightrider.com and got me on my quest.
#22
03-12-2007 | 07:13 PM
Cruiser
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Disappointed in new cams!
Im here to tell ya the tw37 rock. I have used them in many bikes and have made up to 98hp 104trq. Even in a stock comp. 88in engine i get 82 hp 87trq on a 100 degree day. I flow H-D heads almost everyday, when there
stock they suck. There is ALOT to be gained by doing some port work to them. The newer 06-07 heads flow much better out of the box than the older heads do. You need good igntion curve also, decent pipes to make it run.
stock they suck. There is ALOT to be gained by doing some port work to them. The newer 06-07 heads flow much better out of the box than the older heads do. You need good igntion curve also, decent pipes to make it run.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
