Exhaust System Topics New and old exhaust system discussions. Fitment issues to sound bites and suggestions. Post them here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Jekill and Hyde

Thoughts before I pull the trigger on this build.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-11-2012, 08:39 AM
jurgie's Avatar
jurgie
jurgie is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 440
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default Thoughts before I pull the trigger on this build.

05 t/c88 Roadking with stage1 a/c,510g mackie cams,se exhaust and pc 111 turner installed in bike as of now.78 hp 87 tq
WORK TO BE DONE
88 TO 98 W/ CP 10.0.1 PISTONS DOME CC 3
.030 HEAD GASKET
05 HEADS TO BE WORKED MILD PORT ,VALVES
COMP RELEASES
85 CC HEADS
CLUTCH SPRING IF NEEDED
BIKE WILL BE DYNOED AGAIN
510G MACKIE INT OP. 22 CL 38 DUR 240 CENL98 TDC .194 EXH. OP 52 CLO 12 DUR 244 CENTL 110 TDC .138
COMP CALU. STATIC 10.07.1 CORRECTED 9.33.1 COLD CRANKING 194.1
HILLSIDE KIRBY DJI AND ALL OTHERS WILL THIS WORK WITHOUT PROBELM SUCH AS PINNING etc. I need machine work done also advice on build. SPRING IS COMING. IF IT LOOKS GOOD LET ME KNOW OR IF TOU SEE A PROBELM LET ME KNOW.IAM NOT DRAG RACING CRUISING BUT SOMETIMES I GET ON IT.
 
  #2  
Old 02-11-2012, 10:45 AM
harley_jeff's Avatar
harley_jeff
harley_jeff is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

According to the bigboyz calculator you are going to need a cam with an intake close around 42 deg to get the corrected compression below 9.2:1. Other than that, I like the idea of aiming for a static compression of 10.0:1. Billet cam plate? New inner cam bearings? How much runout does your crank have? SE compensator?
 
  #3  
Old 02-11-2012, 10:54 AM
TORQUEY's Avatar
TORQUEY
TORQUEY is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: East Coast
Posts: 5,159
Received 175 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

How bout a 120R for that baby and be done with it?
 
  #4  
Old 02-11-2012, 12:28 PM
djl's Avatar
djl
djl is offline
HDF Community Team
Veteran: Army
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: san antonio
Posts: 12,243
Received 2,221 Likes on 1,607 Posts
Default

You must have assumed zero deck when you ran your calcs? I get nearly slightly lower numbers bur CCP is still over 190psi. It's subjective and a personal choice but with todays fuel and if you live where summer temps hit 100+, I would keep CCP under 190psi for a street build/cruiser. A cam with a later intake close, say 40-42 (there are several very good alternatives) would be worthy of consideration. Did you correct for altitude?

Did you check crank ruout before deciding to go with gear drive cams? I assume you will replace the inner cam bearings with upgraded Torringtons; just left that out of your description.

The SE compensator will not fit the early cranks but it would be a good idea to shave .030" off the end of the compensator nut to insure that the necessary clamping pressure is applied when torqued. It may not need it but it's cheap and will insure the compensator is tight. I have added an additonal spring to early comenators that rattle or make noise or you can replace the spring pack. There are fewer issues with the early compensators than there have been with the later ones.

As usual, JMHO. Should be a good runner.
 
  #5  
Old 02-11-2012, 01:54 PM
jurgie's Avatar
jurgie
jurgie is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 440
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djl
You must have assumed zero deck when you ran your calcs? I get nearly slightly lower numbers bur CCP is still over 190psi. It's subjective and a personal choice but with todays fuel and if you live where summer temps hit 100+, I would keep CCP under 190psi for a street build/cruiser. A cam with a later intake close, say 40-42 (there are several very good alternatives) would be worthy of consideration. Did you correct for altitude?

Did you check crank ruout before deciding to go with gear drive cams? I assume you will replace the inner cam bearings with upgraded Torringtons; just left that out of your description.

The SE compensator will not fit the early cranks but it would be a good idea to shave .030" off the end of the compensator nut to insure that the necessary clamping pressure is applied when torqued. It may not need it but it's cheap and will insure the compensator is tight. I have added an additonal spring to early comenators that rattle or make noise or you can replace the spring pack. There are fewer issues with the early compensators than there have been with the later ones.

As usual, JMHO. Should be a good runner.
dji,yes the bearings and lower has been upgraded.Aiso Iam in wis alt 1000 above sea level recal. ccp comes to 188 ,Aiso i have a .030 spacer on comp.Also mackie does have that .590 closes at 42 but thats more money and i didnt want to open the bottom again. cp does have a flat top piston doomed cc -1.6 ILL have to see those calc. though Ill check static comp 9.62.1 corrected comp 8.82 ccp177.9 allittle low I would like 9.8 to 10.
 
  #6  
Old 02-11-2012, 02:05 PM
jurgie's Avatar
jurgie
jurgie is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 440
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by harley_jeff
According to the bigboyz calculator you are going to need a cam with an intake close around 42 deg to get the corrected compression below 9.2:1. Other than that, I like the idea of aiming for a static compression of 10.0:1. Billet cam plate? New inner cam bearings? How much runout does your crank have? SE compensator?
yes bottom was upgraded crank ran good Any suggestion to get corrected comp below 9.2to1 without changing cams..040 head gasket but that might cause a probelm. I do get gas around here thx much.
 
  #7  
Old 02-11-2012, 02:57 PM
jurgie's Avatar
jurgie
jurgie is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 440
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jurgie
yes bottom was upgraded crank ran good Any suggestion to get corrected comp below 9.2to1 without changing cams..040 head gasket but that might cause a probelm. I do get gas around here thx much.
whats the reasoning for corrected comp to be 9.2:1 or under I thought 9.3;1 was ok
 
  #8  
Old 02-11-2012, 03:29 PM
jurgie's Avatar
jurgie
jurgie is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 440
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djl
You must have assumed zero deck when you ran your calcs? I get nearly slightly lower numbers bur CCP is still over 190psi. It's subjective and a personal choice but with todays fuel and if you live where summer temps hit 100+, I would keep CCP under 190psi for a street build/cruiser. A cam with a later intake close, say 40-42 (there are several very good alternatives) would be worthy of consideration. Did you correct for altitude?

Did you check crank ruout before deciding to go with gear drive cams? I assume you will replace the inner cam bearings with upgraded Torringtons; just left that out of your description.

The SE compensator will not fit the early cranks but it would be a good idea to shave .030" off the end of the compensator nut to insure that the necessary clamping pressure is applied when torqued. It may not need it but it's cheap and will insure the compensator is tight. I have added an additonal spring to early comenators that rattle or make noise or you can replace the spring pack. There are fewer issues with the early compensators than there have been with the later ones.

As usual, JMHO. Should be a good runner.
dji, deck height .003 does this look right plus 1000 above sea level corected is at 9.28:1 ccp 187 sound right if so i like
 
  #9  
Old 02-11-2012, 03:46 PM
northeastconfederate's Avatar
northeastconfederate
northeastconfederate is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Egypt, NJ
Posts: 497
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

As djl said, what's "ok" is subjective. Some will say 195 psi (and ~9.6 corrected compression) is ok, some say 190 (and ~9.3 corrected comp) is safer. You don't want to go with a thicker head gasket; the tighter squish band created by the .030 head gasket will be less likely to ping than with the .040 gasket.
 
  #10  
Old 02-11-2012, 05:17 PM
djl's Avatar
djl
djl is offline
HDF Community Team
Veteran: Army
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: san antonio
Posts: 12,243
Received 2,221 Likes on 1,607 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jurgie
dji, deck height .003 does this look right plus 1000 above sea level corected is at 9.28:1 ccp 187 sound right if so i like
I like that better too; I would run it.
 


Quick Reply: Thoughts before I pull the trigger on this build.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 PM.