S.E ll slip ons VS Rinehart slip ons
#1
#2
#4
#5
I'd have to say about a 5. To me they also give the sound as if you had a touch of a cam. There's a bunch of riders where I work, there're running V&H, Bub, Hooker, Rineharts and others. But fire up the Mistriss and her stock head pipes, with the BCT baffles inside the SE2 slipons, nothing out there sounds like it. And now that I've done some engine work, they really talk!!!
#7
The Rineharts will be much louder than the SE II's for sure. I had Rineharts and thought they were too loud on my Ultra. I took them apart and put muffler packing around the baffel. This dropped the tone a lot and the sound some. They were still pretty loud though so I switched to Jackpots from FuelMoto. I am running the PC III and the SE AC with the Jackpot slip on mufflers.
Trending Topics
#8
The Rineharts will be much louder than the SE II's for sure. I had Rineharts and thought they were too loud on my Ultra. I took them apart and put muffler packing around the baffel. This dropped the tone a lot and the sound some. They were still pretty loud though so I switched to Jackpots from FuelMoto. I am running the PC III and the SE AC with the Jackpot slip on mufflers.
Did you have to get it dynoed or did it run ok Im also going to order a pc lll or V from fuelmoto and i have a the SE air cleaner
Thanks Tim
#9
Back when I was only running SE2 slipons and an open intake I never did flash the emc or use any type of fuel management. My bike ran a touch rich anyway, so I keept getin it. Your's could work out the same, maybe not. You wont know till you change things out and run it. Also If you do go with the PC3, I think a map from there website will work good enough. I wouldn't waste the time or money for a dyno run, save that for later when you really do some engine mods.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post