Exhaust System Topics New and old exhaust system discussions. Fitment issues to sound bites and suggestions. Post them here.

head work for SE 103 big bore w/255 cams?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 10-24-2008 | 04:46 PM
Big Twi$t's Avatar
Big Twi$t
Thread Starter
|
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 53
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by lkr0
on my first build I knew one thing; I did not want to do it again.

i took one suggestions and that is I talked to all the MAJOR companys except for S&S (no response) it came down to a choice of HQs and GMR -- both were complimetary in price and expectations.

I felt more comfortable with HQs they talked me out getting a lot of unnesscessary stuff that they could have easily sold me ---- all I wanted was a build that would be reliable, do rolling burnouts, clutch induced wheelies, and get sideways--I did a HQs 103 on my 07 SG -- it was the right choice for me.

I now have HQs 107 on my RG -- I'm still getting it dialed in but I have already got the front tire in the air--have to practice in the privacy of my cul de sac on the rolling burnouts and getting it sideways -- until I know 99% of the time what this b will do I'll keep practicing

You have so many options -- choose the best one for you -- and I would not rule out a 120--that will be my next build

It is imperative you get parts that compliment each other -- this I found out from members on this board
I'm trying to figure out what would work/compliment together. as far as a 120" build...maybe someday on my next scoot.
 
  #22  
Old 10-25-2008 | 02:42 AM
skyhook's Avatar
skyhook
Tourer
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Default

call baisley high performance...they have had excellent results with 103, ported heads, se255 combo...go to latus h-d website...they have a forum with dyno charts to prove it...baisley's setup makes more lowrange and midrange torque than some much larger engines
 
  #23  
Old 10-25-2008 | 10:11 PM
SuperAhcmed's Avatar
SuperAhcmed
Banned
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by brypink
This post interest me the most. Even though I said I'm not worried about price, I still shop around, do research and make a decision on all factors at a given price point. But, a lower price with all good factors...I like.

You and another member said these are good heads. I will definitely check them out. Do you recommend Andrews 37g cams with these heads and my SE 103"?

Again, thanks for your time.

The Andrews 37g cams are good no nonsense low to midrange power cams and they work VERY WELL with the NRHS stage 1 porting job. Its an excellent bang for the buck setup. I know Dan at NRHS very well and he will steer you in the right direction.

A good second choice is R&R Cycles in Manchester NH. They are right down the street from me literally, and I have know Reg. Jr. for YEARS. He also does some very good work and is a very reputable man in the industry. But I still feel that at the $550 price point, the NRHS CNC job is a better BANG for the BUCK. They are an excellent compliment to grinds like the Andrews 37g and Woods TW-6 cams.

Anyway here are the websites to both places: http://www.nrhsperformance.com http://www.rrcycles.com
 
  #24  
Old 10-25-2008 | 10:48 PM
mgmmgm's Avatar
mgmmgm
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,711
Likes: 6
From: Spokane, WA.
Question 96 to 103

I recently posted on "another 103 question" however- i hope to get more information regarding my 103 build.

I e-mailed to Dan Baisley about head work and he was really cool getting back to me- they will do the heads for sure.

My Indy and Baisley did not see a need to bump up my CR from stock with my Redshift cam, just suggested roller rockers.

I notice that most othr builds of the 103 variety are running more CR in their builds, will my 103 be a dog if the CR is not changed?

Anyone know what the CVO 103 CR is and what hp and trq they make?

I am not looking for three digit HP and Trq, just some more roll on power and slightly more punch = more smile per mile.

thanks,

Mark
 
  #25  
Old 10-26-2008 | 06:43 PM
nick@nite's Avatar
nick@nite
Road Warrior
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 70
Default

I would listen to the indy who I presume is doing the work and the baisley for the heads and cams to go with your setup.

I run 9-8 comp with my 103, runs great............I have no comp releases dont need them
didnot have them on my 95" dyna either.

The nutcase I rode with today( what a beauty it was here in south eastern ma} has a 103
with all the toys, 10.5-1 comp, with realeases ,, thundermax, woods cams etc......
doesnot pull away from me, we have raced to many times to count, rolling starts, dead starts , topend etc.......

there are many on this board who know there stuff, but unless they are working on your bike??? stick with your indy.........Im sure baisley will steer you in right direction.
 
  #26  
Old 10-26-2008 | 07:29 PM
Big Twi$t's Avatar
Big Twi$t
Thread Starter
|
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 53
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by SuperAhcmed
The Andrews 37g cams are good no nonsense low to midrange power cams and they work VERY WELL with the NRHS stage 1 porting job. Its an excellent bang for the buck setup. I know Dan at NRHS very well and he will steer you in the right direction.

A good second choice is R&R Cycles in Manchester NH. They are right down the street from me literally, and I have know Reg. Jr. for YEARS. He also does some very good work and is a very reputable man in the industry. But I still feel that at the $550 price point, the NRHS CNC job is a better BANG for the BUCK. They are an excellent compliment to grinds like the Andrews 37g and Woods TW-6 cams.

Anyway here are the websites to both places: http://www.nrhsperformance.com http://www.rrcycles.com
Thanks again for your advice.
 
  #27  
Old 10-27-2008 | 09:54 PM
mgmmgm's Avatar
mgmmgm
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,711
Likes: 6
From: Spokane, WA.
Default

I notice that most other builds of the 103 variety are running more CR in their builds, will my 103 be a dog if the CR is not changed from stock 9:2:1 ?
 
  #28  
Old 10-28-2008 | 08:22 AM
SuperAhcmed's Avatar
SuperAhcmed
Banned
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mgmmgm
I notice that most other builds of the 103 variety are running more CR in their builds, will my 103 be a dog if the CR is not changed from stock 9:2:1 ?
A full point bump in compression might gain you 5-10 hp assuming your cams specs will work well with it without timing and detonation issues. But at the lower compression point your ride isnt going to be a "dog". If anything, it is a bit easier to tune and is going to be potentially more forgiving on the octane you use at the pump.
 
  #29  
Old 10-28-2008 | 08:52 AM
new_mentor70's Avatar
new_mentor70
Tourer
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Diamond bar, California
Default

Originally Posted by mgmmgm
I notice that most other builds of the 103 variety are running more CR in their builds, will my 103 be a dog if the CR is not changed from stock 9:2:1 ?
no, if the right cams and heads are chosen, it should still have good torque.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Not E'nuff Harley
Engine Mechanical Topics
9
10-21-2016 08:52 AM
DoubleZ
Exhaust System Topics
9
05-15-2013 09:34 AM
rodehard68jr
Touring Models
6
03-03-2012 03:07 PM
London dude
Exhaust System Topics
12
02-06-2012 06:19 PM
GliderXXX
Touring Models
6
08-10-2007 10:26 AM



Quick Reply: head work for SE 103 big bore w/255 cams?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 AM.