Exhaust System Topics New and old exhaust system discussions. Fitment issues to sound bites and suggestions. Post them here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Jekill and Hyde

New Cam/performance question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-07-2008, 09:46 AM
expolice's Avatar
expolice
expolice is offline
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Flat Rock, Michigan
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default New Cam/performance question

I have a new Andrews 26G cam gear drive setup I was thinking of installing in a 02 FXDL 88" with stage 1 already completed. Most of my cruising is highway/freeway I-75. The reason I was considering the Andrews 26G was to A) eliminate the dreaded cam chain tensioner maintenence and B) to improve the low/middle torque curve of the motor. I might consider consider going to a 95" big bore kit in the future but not now as money is tight and job security is becoming a question in this economy. I have a few questions regarding this upgrade.
1st: Is this too much cam if I don't go to a 95" big bore kit?
2nd: Would be using the .030 headgaskets by themselves (meaning no othe engine mods except the cams) during the installation make any noticeable difference?
3rd: If I had to choose; would I be better off getting the heads milled/ported/polished and using the .030 headgaskets versus going to the 95" BB be a wiser choice?
I realise the best choice for these cams would probably be to go with both the BB and the head work, but I will have to space this job out over a couple of riding seasons due to funding issues.

Thanks for the input!
 
  #2  
Old 10-07-2008, 11:40 AM
splitting_lanes's Avatar
splitting_lanes
splitting_lanes is offline
Tourer
Join Date: May 2008
Location:
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

to answer your questions as best I can, no the 26 is not too much cam if you don't do anything else. You could put it in without removing the heads at all and realize a gain.

If you are planning to remove the heads, then a thinner gasket would help, I would venture to say it would be noticeable. However, it's a lot of work that you don't need to do to change the cam.

I'll be the pros will echo me in saying that if you can afford to do the whole thing at once, do BB and porting in addition to the cam and you'll be pleased. I couldn't afford to do the whole thing at once, so I did just the cam and it worked out well for me. Don't forget to budget a few hundred for tuning on a dyno after whatever mods you make.....
 
  #3  
Old 10-07-2008, 11:51 AM
Kingofcubes's Avatar
Kingofcubes
Kingofcubes is offline
Road Master
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mitchellville, Ia.
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Rr525

The bolt in cam I like is the new RR525G cam which will pull heat out of the engine as well as jacking up the low and mid range torque. Will even work better if you decide to go to 95 or 98" with higher compression (9.8 to 10.2) and even better with head porting.
 
  #4  
Old 10-07-2008, 03:12 PM
bazam9s's Avatar
bazam9s
bazam9s is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kingofcubes
The bolt in cam I like is the new RR525G cam which will pull heat out of the engine as well as jacking up the low and mid range torque. Will even work better if you decide to go to 95 or 98" with higher compression (9.8 to 10.2) and even better with head porting.
King..the R&R525g has almost identical charateristics as the Andrews TW37g..except the RR has .015 more lift..(according to the Boyz calc.) Where can we see more info on this cam..I went to the RR site but can't seem to find numbers and price..thx
 
  #5  
Old 10-07-2008, 06:16 PM
mtclassic's Avatar
mtclassic
mtclassic is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,437
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kingofcubes
The bolt in cam I like is the new RR525G cam which will pull heat out of the engine as well as jacking up the low and mid range torque. Will even work better if you decide to go to 95 or 98" with higher compression (9.8 to 10.2) and even better with head porting.
I contacted R&R and their response was that it needed more than stock compression. I want to try one but just can not find any dyno charts. Everyone I know personally that used 37's on stock 88's and even 95 without bumping the compression said they were disappointed down low.
 
  #6  
Old 10-07-2008, 06:26 PM
Harleypingman's Avatar
Harleypingman
Harleypingman is offline
Extreme HDF Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 10,449
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

expolice: The Andrews 26 will be fine in a stock 88 and the 95 later if you decide to do it. Depending on future headwork, the 26 might not be enough cam for the 95.

Do the cam swap--you may be surprised by the performance improvement and you won't think about headwork now especially if money is tight.
 
  #7  
Old 10-07-2008, 08:44 PM
expolice's Avatar
expolice
expolice is offline
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Flat Rock, Michigan
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks to all for the information. Employer says all is OK, but with latest drop in stock price and stock market, I fear bankrupcy may be near. OL's employer may also be approaching similar fate. We live in SE Michigan and both work in the declining auto industry! Since I already have the 26G cams and bearings, looks like the next step is to pick up the adjustable pushrods so I avoid removal of the heads. Any advice on adjustable pushrods brands to buy/avoid? I'll start saving pennies for possible head work if/when I do the big bore kit. I'm not trying to light the pavement on fire; just looking to improve my ability to pass the many gravel haulers that I encounter daily when I commute on I-75. Had some gravel/road debris once hit and break off the end of the oil pressure sending unit and put a nice cut across the toe of my boot! Maybe I should look for either a better/safer way to ride to work or maybe a different job altogether with better future job security!
 
  #8  
Old 10-08-2008, 06:18 AM
Hillsidecycle.com's Avatar
Hillsidecycle.com
Hillsidecycle.com is offline
Sponsor
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,085
Received 822 Likes on 587 Posts
Default Stage I, T/C Heads

We use S&S pushrods a lot here.
Some mild cylinder head work*, without breaking the bank, with spark it up quite a bit.
 
  #9  
Old 10-09-2008, 08:06 AM
SuperAhcmed's Avatar
SuperAhcmed
SuperAhcmed is offline
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by expolice
I have a new Andrews 26G cam gear drive setup I was thinking of installing in a 02 FXDL 88" with stage 1 already completed. Most of my cruising is highway/freeway I-75. The reason I was considering the Andrews 26G was to A) eliminate the dreaded cam chain tensioner maintenence and B) to improve the low/middle torque curve of the motor. I might consider consider going to a 95" big bore kit in the future but not now as money is tight and job security is becoming a question in this economy. I have a few questions regarding this upgrade.
1st: Is this too much cam if I don't go to a 95" big bore kit?
2nd: Would be using the .030 headgaskets by themselves (meaning no othe engine mods except the cams) during the installation make any noticeable difference?
3rd: If I had to choose; would I be better off getting the heads milled/ported/polished and using the .030 headgaskets versus going to the 95" BB be a wiser choice?
I realise the best choice for these cams would probably be to go with both the BB and the head work, but I will have to space this job out over a couple of riding seasons due to funding issues.

Thanks for the input!
OK to get through some of the BS here and make it simple.

A. The Andrews 26g is a great cam. WIll give you what your looking for regardless of the piston size(ie: 88" or 95" setup)used.

B. On that stock engine there is no garentee what a .030 thick headgasket will do until you yourself or someone else clays and cc's the engine to see where your compression and squishband are at right now.

C. DO NOT do a "big bore kit"! DO NOT BUY NEW 95" cylinders. If your going to go 95" then get your stock cylinders BORED out! THey are already seasoned and if bored correctly(with tq plates)by a competent shop will give you a much better ring seal then getting a pair of junk off the self cylinders from HD. You will also save considerable money going this route as well, only needing to buy a new pair of pistons and rings.


Honestly if you already have the gear drive setup, go ahead and buy some cast HD 95" pistons and rings and get the job done all at once. Doing the 95" route in parts should cost you no more than about $200. Having your stock cylinders bored should run no more than $100 as well.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bedelman10
Engine Mechanical Topics
98
07-21-2016 07:00 PM
BungoBill
EVO
18
06-06-2012 12:19 PM
hdrider53
Exhaust System Topics
4
11-21-2010 11:44 AM
hondo96inch
Exhaust System Topics
14
09-18-2007 10:07 AM
williams3803
Exhaust System Topics
4
09-13-2007 01:29 PM



Quick Reply: New Cam/performance question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.