Zippers Cams
#1
#2
#3
RE: Zippers Cams
We had a customer that had that cam in a 103 and the out putdown low was poor the upper was ok but overall not a good streetable cam with the 9.7.1 compression, so with stock compression it would be worse. Swapped it out for a andrews 54 power was up, cam noise gone. Much much more low end power. With the amount of cams out today the selection is so large you can choose a cam that will fit your riding style. No need to by a cam that will be a so-so cam for your needs. The woods line is impressive, as is the andrews line of cam. The 117 that we just finished has the woods 9b in it and power is on tap from the low rpm range , pulls out very nice. Set it at 10.7 compression.
#4
RE: Zippers Cams
If you are a fan of Andrews, then I suggest the 54 as it is specifically engineeredtowards baggers and will give you the grunt down low in the RPM range. Other good suggestions are the HQ500 and the Woods TW6. Both will work well with increased compression up to about 10.2:1
#6
RE: Zippers Cams
I just had the Zippers 575 cam installed not even 300 miles on it....
Zippers was all over it saying how it "wakes up" the 96 stocker. So- I had this cam put in, and my local indy recommeded it over a wood cam- go figure.
So i wonder now, how the Zippers cam compares to the cam HD wrench spoke about?
So far the cam works well - pulls with my friends 107 EVO and his motor aint stock; i do have more valve train noise which is more noticable than stock which is not what I was after.
Zippers was all over it saying how it "wakes up" the 96 stocker. So- I had this cam put in, and my local indy recommeded it over a wood cam- go figure.
So i wonder now, how the Zippers cam compares to the cam HD wrench spoke about?
So far the cam works well - pulls with my friends 107 EVO and his motor aint stock; i do have more valve train noise which is more noticable than stock which is not what I was after.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post