Exhaust System Topics New and old exhaust system discussions. Fitment issues to sound bites and suggestions. Post them here.

I thought 2 into 1 was supposed to be better

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-06-2007 | 11:02 AM
pablo pelon's Avatar
pablo pelon
Thread Starter
|
Cruiser
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: League City,TEXAS
Default I thought 2 into 1 was supposed to be better

A buddy had his bike dynoed and the guy told him his V&H 2 into 1 was restricting the air flow andif he was to buy the Rinehart true duels he had at his boothhim he would be able to get 20 more HP and more torque out of it right then and there. Well my friend spent the $1000 for the new pipes and another dyno.My question is can a dyno tech manipulate the machine to make it read out better? The bike is stock exept for a SE air breather.
 
  #2  
Old 11-06-2007 | 12:18 PM
bobcowan's Avatar
bobcowan
Road Warrior
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,950
Likes: 1
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Default RE: I thought 2 into 1 was supposed to be better

Yes, the numbers can easily be manipulated with a few key strokes.

2-1 pipes are better for the low end torque. True duals are better for the top end.
 
  #3  
Old 11-06-2007 | 02:34 PM
pablo pelon's Avatar
pablo pelon
Thread Starter
|
Cruiser
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: League City,TEXAS
Default RE: I thought 2 into 1 was supposed to be better

That's what I was thinking ,because the tuner talked about four people into new pipes.I haven't seen the numbers on my friends bike but I'd be interested to seeif his torque came up.
 
  #4  
Old 11-06-2007 | 03:23 PM
HDWRENCH's Avatar
HDWRENCH
Road Master
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 5
From: Fort Worth TX
Default RE: I thought 2 into 1 was supposed to be better

A good 2-1 pipe with equal legnth header pipes are the best way to go. If you dont have that they you are not running what would be called a true performance 2-1. The V-H pipe is ok and can be made to run well with some baffle work, the true deul pipe he spoke of my give him more top end but mainly what we see is a tq dip in the lower rpm range
 
  #5  
Old 11-06-2007 | 03:23 PM
HarleyWood's Avatar
HarleyWood
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 2
From: Tulsa, OK
Default RE: I thought 2 into 1 was supposed to be better

wow..I hope he at least got a kiss..

He probably will see HP gains in the top end, but will never know it unless he routinely runs at about 5000 rpm. He most certainly lost low end torque.
Sounds like he bought an over priced set of duals to me.

 
  #6  
Old 11-06-2007 | 04:27 PM
Harleypingman's Avatar
Harleypingman
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,449
Likes: 44
From: Roswell, GA
Default RE: I thought 2 into 1 was supposed to be better

Harley Wood: Please post the name of the dyno tuner.
 
  #7  
Old 11-06-2007 | 05:05 PM
HarleyWood's Avatar
HarleyWood
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 2
From: Tulsa, OK
Default RE: I thought 2 into 1 was supposed to be better

ORIGINAL: Harleypingman

Harley Wood: Please post the name of the dyno tuner.
??Huh??

you must have meant pablo pelon, he was the OP that started the thread
 
  #8  
Old 11-06-2007 | 06:48 PM
PhilM's Avatar
PhilM
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,939
Likes: 3
From: TX
Default RE: I thought 2 into 1 was supposed to be better

I agree w/Steve.... ProPipe is decent, but better w/baffle mods.

Your buddy will probably see slightly higher PEAK HP, but +20 HP & Ft/lbs of torque ~ NO F'ing WAY! Not if the bike was equally tuned with both sets of pipes.

I hope he likes it, but I doubt that ridability will improve.
 
  #9  
Old 11-06-2007 | 09:28 PM
GliderXXX's Avatar
GliderXXX
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 52
From: DFW
Default RE: I thought 2 into 1 was supposed to be better

Even with my first go around with the Fatcat on my Stage II SG where I switched back to duals, I got 5 more HP with the Fatcat than duals. For me, the bike without higher CR, was where the torque didn't see much improvement between the two. I'm getting my bike retuned right now and will see after a full tune whatI have, but with the 10-1CR the Fatcat pulls harder through out the entire rev band, low-mid-high.
 
  #10  
Old 11-06-2007 | 09:43 PM
Dalton's Avatar
Dalton
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,663
Likes: 7
From: Northeast Ohio
Default RE: I thought 2 into 1 was supposed to be better

That, and with the Rineharts, you will often see a dip in the torque at about 2400-2700 rpm, then they will start to kick in, well above 3000 RPM. If you have a big inch engine, this is not too critical, but for a stocker, it is definitely noticeable.
2-1 is the way to go if you want low end torque with a pretty flat power band.
20+ hp and tq?, hell I would never build another engine if it was that simple to gain that much power.
 


Quick Reply: I thought 2 into 1 was supposed to be better



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 PM.