I'm considering the Dave Mackie TC510G cam, seen here. Does anyone have any experience with Dave Mackie cams. His stuff is pretty highly respected here on the West Coast.

 

I have not heard anything negitive about Mackie.

I think he may fall into the dreaded "hot rod" harley guy catagory,and get a bad wrap from us tarmak weenies!

 

Well, he does hold a few records, as far as I know. I believe his cams are custom-cut by Andrews to his specs.

 

Here in central wi. The local dealer uses these on most of there 88 to 95"
builds.....thats the build im currently looking at on my 03 fxdl dyna...
Cams the mackie 510, or se 211...or andrews 37 ???...in the 88" to 95" build........any thoughts

 

I have no personal experience with DM cams, but I've never heard anything negative about them. On the other hand, I have heard a few positives.

 

the dm cams are a pretty good cam designed to do what it was ment for. its a mild cam compared to a lot of other cams on the market.
its no match compared to a wood tw6 cam but also the wood cam is more expensive.
other cams to consider are the 37 ,T-man 525

 

OBP , try contacting My Garage in Ventura as they have quite a bit of experience with installing Dave Mackie parts of all types. I have been meaning to get over to talk to them and just have not made it...yet.

 

Just got my bike back..95" kit, mikuni 42, mackie 510 cams...they pull hard..
From idle thru....really feel it when you get on the throttle...would recomend any time......love um

 

Thats great to hear. i met a guy in Anaheim the other day that has his CVO 110 at Mackies right now, I well ck it out when its done. kinda exited to see how it turns out.

 

I don't know much about that cam, but I did some research on this one seems great cam with great results I see people dyno thair bikes anywhere from 88 to 92 hp,
woods TW-408-44