EVO All Evo Model Discussion

Am I nuts????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 10-06-2019 | 07:31 AM
98hotrodfatboy's Avatar
98hotrodfatboy
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 18,332
Received 5,478 Likes on 3,652 Posts
From: Poolville
Default

Originally Posted by TwiZted Biker
Properly built 89" stock motor can be as much fun and nobody would know you have a sleeper till you lite it up. That 111" would pay for it with some left over.
That's exactly what I have... One of John's. He loaned it to me till we can get my 96"er back together... Hell of a motor....
 
  #32  
Old 10-06-2019 | 09:25 AM
aces&8s's Avatar
aces&8s
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,567
Received 577 Likes on 383 Posts
From: almost there
Default

I for one wont be going backwards. The S&S 111 is an Evo with 120 plus TQ-Hp "without being built and losing its longevity" as the 0rigional 80" will. My 97 WG is far from being stock so that is not my intent to go back to factory.
I have never left any of my bikes stock but to each their own. All my past rides were built 80" and I loved every one of them even with the longevity shortened. So you can say I already been there done that. To me, I now have the ultimate EVO with power and longevity. So cry me a river if ya dont like my ride, Im going for a ride now and I will stop when I see ya on the side of the road. Aces.....
 
  #33  
Old 10-06-2019 | 11:11 AM
splattttttt's Avatar
splattttttt
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,652
Received 430 Likes on 379 Posts
From: MASS_hole

Default

Originally Posted by TwiZted Biker
Properly built 89" stock motor can be as much fun and nobody would know you have a sleeper till you lite it up. That 111" would pay for it with some left over.
Is there a build sheet for it? No intention of doin it. But live to know what goes in it to make it like that.
I love my TC 103 and the tweaks i added. A sleeper foe sure.
 
  #34  
Old 10-06-2019 | 01:07 PM
texashillcountry's Avatar
texashillcountry
Thread Starter
|
Dirt don't hurt
Veteran: Navy
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 21,008
Likes: 0
Received 4,361 Likes on 1,953 Posts
From: Haslet Texas
Default

Originally Posted by aces&8s
I for one wont be going backwards. The S&S 111 is an Evo with 120 plus TQ-Hp "without being built and losing its longevity" as the 0rigional 80" will. My 97 WG is far from being stock so that is not my intent to go back to factory.
I have never left any of my bikes stock but to each their own. All my past rides were built 80" and I loved every one of them even with the longevity shortened. So you can say I already been there done that. To me, I now have the ultimate EVO with power and longevity. So cry me a river if ya dont like my ride, Im going for a ride now and I will stop when I see ya on the side of the road. Aces.....
Dude nobody said it was a bad motor!!!
Hell it's a great motor with a crap ton of power but like I said where I ride I can't use the power 90% of the time.
Seems like a waste to me.
 
  #35  
Old 10-06-2019 | 02:58 PM
aces&8s's Avatar
aces&8s
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,567
Received 577 Likes on 383 Posts
From: almost there
Default

Originally Posted by texashillcountry
Dude nobody said it was a bad motor!!!
Hell it's a great motor with a crap ton of power but like I said where I ride I can't use the power 90% of the time.
Seems like a waste to me.
Im just saying what works for me. Building a big stroker is not in my future. My statement was not directed at you ol bud.
 
  #36  
Old 10-06-2019 | 05:30 PM
glidein wide's Avatar
glidein wide
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,479
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts
From: ct
Default

Originally Posted by texashillcountry
Nice idea but I already have 2 bikes and I don't really want 3.
Don't want 3 bikes? Never heard of such a thing! Lol....
 
  #37  
Old 10-06-2019 | 06:16 PM
Tonebender's Avatar
Tonebender
Seasoned HDF Member
Veteran: Navy
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 7,961
Received 9,516 Likes on 3,617 Posts
From: Florida
Default

I have not been able to shake EVO fever since 1986. So I have three motorcycles and contemplating number four. I am probably nuts too.
 
  #38  
Old 10-06-2019 | 06:22 PM
TwiZted Biker's Avatar
TwiZted Biker
Club Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 65,051
Received 49,084 Likes on 17,944 Posts
From: Niles Canyon Ca.
Riders Club Member
Default

Originally Posted by splattttttt
Is there a build sheet for it? No intention of doin it. But live to know what goes in it to make it like that.
I love my TC 103 and the tweaks i added. A sleeper foe sure.
You want to talk to johnjzjz, thing is if you aren't going to actually do it I doubt he'd invest the effort. Good head work, new crank assembly to stroke it with the right bore & compression, cam choice and a few other upgrades over stock stuff is the basics.
 
  #39  
Old 10-06-2019 | 07:20 PM
1997bagger's Avatar
1997bagger
Grand HDF Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,933
Received 1,795 Likes on 893 Posts
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by splattttttt
Is there a build sheet for it? No intention of doin it. But live to know what goes in it to make it like that.
I love my TC 103 and the tweaks i added. A sleeper foe sure.
S&S 4 5/8 crank, stock bore, S&S(only make cast)or Sportster pistons both in flat tops, 72 cc chambers with port clean up, .030 head gaskets comes up at 10.0-1 to 10.2 compression. W6H is a good cam for it, no compression releases needed and a sleeper until it's time not to be, the 89" with a S&S crank IS a great engine that will last.
 
The following users liked this post:
TwiZted Biker (10-06-2019)
  #40  
Old 10-07-2019 | 01:29 AM
Schex's Avatar
Schex
Supporter
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,343
Received 7,053 Likes on 1,861 Posts
From: SE Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by TwiZted Biker
That 111" would pay for it with some left over.
Nope, nice wish though
 


Quick Reply: Am I nuts????



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:27 PM.