Yes, however that is a touring engine, like my V107T, which came with a G! Which only proves that 'rules' on such matters are there to be broken! I was advised against a 113" or 124" at the time of considering an S&S engine, as those were not considered suitable for a touring bike. Both 113 and 124 at the time, in 2008, came with a G.

 

I'll be the judge of what type of engine I cruise with, thank you very much.

Swing my leg over a Tomahawk missile, she'll cruise just fine.

 

But does that Tomahawk come with an E or a G tho...;p

 

 

Super D. Go big or go home!

 

Just tuned a 111 with an E, Wood 6H, RB pipe.
Torque was off the chart....hp was good, not great, but good.
A G would have ripped the hp more, but at the suspected sacrifice of low end power.
We have bored E's before.....we call them F carbs here, not like F Troop however....
Scott

 

On a 111, I doubt you'll loose any low end torque with the G. I've run a G on a 95 ci TC and it had plenty.. The heads on the 95 did not flow as well as the current 111s so there really wasn't any carb signal issues. The big difference between the 2 carbs will be in throttle repose, mileage and power. The G with the bigger blade will be slightly more touchy down low as cracking the throttle the same amount will provide more air on the G compared to the E. The E will likely get better gas mileage do to being able to tune the transition from intermediate to main better. The G will make more HP assuming the exhaust subsystem can support it.