1.7 rockers on a S&S 585
#21
That's a good way to look at it.. Here is another.. If the valve were to open instantaneously, then yes a higher rocker ratio would only increase lift.. The problem is that it takes time to lift the valve. Hence the 0.053 reference (It's tappet lift BTW not valve).. Since it takes time to lift the valve every point on the valve lift curve is higher. If you plot the 2 curves, the curve with the higher rocker ration will have higher lift for every point above 0 lift.. Hence it will appear a little fatter if you measure the width at say 0.1 inches valve lift.. It's not much but enough to make a 2-3 degree difference if you compare valve lifts at 0.086 which is the 0.053 valve tappet lift for a 1.625 rocker. To get the same valve lift on a 1.725 rocker you would need to check tappet lift at 0.050 inches.
#22
OK, last try. That would be true IF duration was measured from zero lift. It is NOT. Duration is measured from a nominal VALVE lift (.053"). With an increased rocker ratio, upon opening the valve gets to that amount of lift SOONER, and upon closing, reaches that point LATER. Hence the change in duration/timing.
Stych out
Stych out
#23
OK, last try. That would be true IF duration was measured from zero lift. It is NOT. Duration is measured from a nominal VALVE lift (.053"). With an increased rocker ratio, upon opening the valve gets to that amount of lift SOONER, and upon closing, reaches that point LATER. Hence the change in duration/timing.
Stych out
Stych out
#24
So then your basically saying that from 0-.053" its all valve train preload and actual valve lift does not occur until the valve train is preloaded which is at .053" but with a longer rocker the actual valve preload was satisfied @ or around .050 and that .003" is enough to make a 1-2* difference in the duration. I hope I'm getting this because it truly interests me. Not trying to be apita. New territory, Thanx.
#25
So then your basically saying that from 0-.053" its all valve train preload and actual valve lift does not occur until the valve train is preloaded which is at .053" but with a longer rocker the actual valve preload was satisfied @ or around .050 and that .003" is enough to make a 1-2* difference in the duration. I hope I'm getting this because it truly interests me. Not trying to be apita. New territory, Thanx.
You are basically correct except that your assumption (in bold) is not correct.. Typically the valve lash / preload / flex and lifter bleed is probably dome in the first 10 to 20 thou of lift on lifting the seat.. Maybe a little less.. It depends on stiffness of parts, mass and spring rate. This is in theory as I've not measured it. Take some pricey equipment and you can see some of it on you-tube.. Still the start ramp preloads train slowly up to about 0.020 lift, then accelerates the valve quickly as allowed by the design (seen and measured this). The whole reason for the 0.053 tappet lift check point is to get beyond the ramps and more on the slope of the cam as the needle on an indicator moves faster, the measurement can be more precise. On the opening side, you could easily make the measurement at a lower lift up as typically the dropping side needs more set down ramp to help take up the lash caused by the collapsing lifter.. Remember a lifter is nothing more then a lash limiting device that start to bleed down as soon as the pushrod starts to increase force on the lifter cup.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post