Dyna Glide Models Super Glide, Super Glide Sport, Super Glide Custom, Dyna Glide Convertible, Super Glide T-Sport, Dyna Glide Police, Dyna Switchback, Low Rider, Street Bob, Fat Bob and Wide Glide.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Progressive lowering kit on FXDWG Forks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-02-2014, 08:03 AM
jgcable's Avatar
jgcable
jgcable is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default Progressive lowering kit on FXDWG Forks

I am replacing the stock aluminum lower forks on my 2006 Wide Glide with chrome ones.
I want to also rebuild the internals and use the Progressive lowering kit. I would like to lower my bike 1" or maybe the full 2" in the front. What I can't find online are any pictures of what a before and after looks like. I would also like to know if there are any downsides to lowering the front. I heard that it limits the fork travel but because of the design the front forks won't bottom out even if its lowered the full 2". I do mainly 2 up riding on it.

I have no plans on lowering the rear of the bike. Sounds like a stupid question but... by lowering the front end 1" using the Progressive lowering kit is there any noticeable difference in the look of the bike? I have seen many pictures of full 2" drops in the front and I can't see any difference in stance at all on a Wide Glide.
 

Last edited by jgcable; 01-02-2014 at 08:34 AM.
  #2  
Old 01-02-2014, 12:56 PM
dirtdobber's Avatar
dirtdobber
dirtdobber is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: sand mountain Alabama
Posts: 4,749
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

one inch in the front lowered. with 11 inch shocks in the rear.
 
  #3  
Old 01-02-2014, 01:04 PM
jgcable's Avatar
jgcable
jgcable is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I ended up ordering the Progressive 10-1566 lowering kit. I am leaving my stock shocks on the back and lowering the front forks 1". Should look basically the same as the stock set up I have now but the front forks won't dive as much at hard braking when riding 2 up. I also notice on the stock front fork springs that the rebound isn't fast enough sometimes. Its almost a little too plush especially on hard corning on roads that aren't perfectly smooth.
 
  #4  
Old 01-02-2014, 01:05 PM
jgcable's Avatar
jgcable
jgcable is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dirtdobber
one inch in the front lowered. with 11 inch shocks in the rear.
Thanks for the pic. Nice bike you got there.
 
  #5  
Old 01-02-2014, 01:06 PM
dirtdobber's Avatar
dirtdobber
dirtdobber is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: sand mountain Alabama
Posts: 4,749
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Thank you
 
  #6  
Old 01-02-2014, 01:07 PM
ynots's Avatar
ynots
ynots is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 7,138
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

If your only going to lower one end it would make more sense to lower the rear. 2" just on the front sounds crazy to me
 
  #7  
Old 01-02-2014, 02:00 PM
jgcable's Avatar
jgcable
jgcable is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ynots
If your only going to lower one end it would make more sense to lower the rear. 2" just on the front sounds crazy to me

To my eyes looking at my bike at a side profile, it appears the front end is higher than the rear. Even though the bottom frame rails are even from the ground from front to the back it still looks higher in the front. I think its the 21" wheel on the front and the wide glide forks that give the illusion of being higher in the front. Also, I generally 2-up ride and the bike sags pretty good in the rear with 330lbs + on it.

I have seen pics of 1" drops and no drops and its pretty hard to tell the difference.
 
  #8  
Old 01-02-2014, 02:13 PM
ynots's Avatar
ynots
ynots is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 7,138
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

have you tried adjusting the preload on your rear shocks?
 
  #9  
Old 01-02-2014, 02:19 PM
Hero's Avatar
Hero
Hero is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 282
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

No intention of lowering the rear.. okay cool, so are you on stock shocks still? If you are, is there any reason you're not considering raising the rear instead? It would make more sense to me, especially if you're 2-up most of the time and an 8 year old suspension could have sagged quite a bit by now. Also, don't look at the frame rails, I find the exhaust angle is a better indicator of level (assuming you don't have a curved big radius or something fitted).

For both yours & passenger comfort I'd have thought you need more from your suspension, not less.
 
  #10  
Old 01-02-2014, 02:24 PM
jgcable's Avatar
jgcable
jgcable is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ynots
have you tried adjusting the preload on your rear shocks?
No, I never adjusted it. Its set on 3 which is perfect when I am solo. Its a little spongy when my wife is on the back. I should probably turn them up a click.
 


Quick Reply: Progressive lowering kit on FXDWG Forks



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:01 AM.