Tires. Wider is better??
#12
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Nuevo México, Los Estados Unidos de América
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Neither here nor there: aesthetic taste.
Pros: Larger contact patch = better off-the-line traction. Slightly increased lean angle.
Cons: more weight and rolling resistance = couple hp loss at rear wheel.
Yes, but you'd have some modifying to do.
If you really like the wide-tire look it's "worth" if you think so. From a non-aesthetic functionality-based position, no, it's definitely not worth what could easily turn into a $1k project to a couple millimeters of width to your back tire.
#13
Mostly styling. Bigger rubber is only really justified with much bigger power. One issue to watch for is if you increase the difference between front and rear tire widths you have to lean the bike more in a corner to get the same turn rate because the contact patch moves out further so angles the bike away from where you're aiming, but also you might get more lean angle before anything decks. Very small differences though unless you fit something really wild.
#14
#15
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Nuevo México, Los Estados Unidos de América
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Sportsbikes tend to keep the front and rear tires the same size. Many of them actually aren't much fatter than yours (what's yours? 165mm? New bikes are 180mm?) they just look it because the tread extends pretty high up the sides since they lean so far over.
#16
#17
You could always buy a Buell if you want to match that sportsbike!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post