Just scored some TW cams! couple ??s
#1
Just scored some TW cams! couple ??s
Just bought me a set of Bob Wood tw408-44 cams. It was either the TW-6 or these, after a bit of research I think the 408s will be a little more suited for the future plans I have.
I Cant wait to install them... I can't seem to find a 4 degree advance gear though, are the gains even worth running one? I do plan on head work this winter but will probably install the cams within the next few weeks.
I Cant wait to install them... I can't seem to find a 4 degree advance gear though, are the gains even worth running one? I do plan on head work this winter but will probably install the cams within the next few weeks.
#3
"[A]dvancing a cam advances all valve-timing events, ... most importantly [it] closes the intake valve earlier, which increases low rpm cylinder pressure and usually improves low speed torque at the expense of high-rpm horsepower. As can be expected, retarding a cam closes the intake valve later and improves top-end horsepower at the expense of low-speed torque."
http://www.harley-riders-guide.com/h...dson-cams.html
I always kind of wondered why not just get a cam with a different profile/grind instead of screw around with the advance/retard of the cam sprocket/gear ...? If the cam you have doesn't provide the low end torque you desire, select a different cam ... right?
Just thinking out loud here ....
R/
'Chop
http://www.harley-riders-guide.com/h...dson-cams.html
I always kind of wondered why not just get a cam with a different profile/grind instead of screw around with the advance/retard of the cam sprocket/gear ...? If the cam you have doesn't provide the low end torque you desire, select a different cam ... right?
Just thinking out loud here ....
R/
'Chop
#4
"[A]dvancing a cam advances all valve-timing events, ... most importantly [it] closes the intake valve earlier, which increases low rpm cylinder pressure and usually improves low speed torque at the expense of high-rpm horsepower. As can be expected, retarding a cam closes the intake valve later and improves top-end horsepower at the expense of low-speed torque."
http://www.harley-riders-guide.com/h...dson-cams.html
I always kind of wondered why not just get a cam with a different profile/grind instead of screw around with the advance/retard of the cam sprocket/gear ...? If the cam you have doesn't provide the low end torque you desire, select a different cam ... right?
Just thinking out loud here ....
R/
'Chop
http://www.harley-riders-guide.com/h...dson-cams.html
I always kind of wondered why not just get a cam with a different profile/grind instead of screw around with the advance/retard of the cam sprocket/gear ...? If the cam you have doesn't provide the low end torque you desire, select a different cam ... right?
Just thinking out loud here ....
R/
'Chop
I think the same could be said for swapping out different rocker arm ratios to achieve a higher lift. Why swap rockers to achieve a higher lift when you can just buy a cam designed with a higher lift. I've actually been contemplating this mod. 1.725:1 rockers are $140 from HD. For me to buy a new cam and swap it in including new gaskets / o-rings would be more expensive than $140.
Per the bigboyz cam calculator, adding 1.725:1 rockers to the tw6 cams would effectively turn the .510 lift into .541 lift. I've read that the stock 06+ heads can handle up to .600 lift.
Last edited by SC-Longhair; 08-05-2010 at 10:04 AM.
#5
Top end
I really feel these bikes all need mid and top end power improvements. I have never ridden a Harley of any model and said This thing needs more torque down low!
I believe I wll set mine up for the mid top powerband. Maybe if I had a heavier bike I might feel the need for more torque.
I believe I wll set mine up for the mid top powerband. Maybe if I had a heavier bike I might feel the need for more torque.
#6
A 4 degree gear will give you 4lbs extra PSI, it also moves all events to the left. The .030 head gasket will give you 6lbs extra PSI. My 37's were a little soft on the bottom but the 30T pulley made up for that a lot. I would have saved myself a little time and a few gaskets doing the heads the first time when I had the rockers off doing my cams but I thought the cam only would work better than what it did. When I had my heads ported I did the .030 and 1.725's and that did the trick, I'm done with my engine now. I have a T-Max auto tune so tuning wasn't a problem for me but if you figure in that cost also it's better to hold the cams and do the heads at the same time, you can save a few dollars reusing the stock pushrods also. My heads were $375. for porting cc'ing and shipping from FL to ME and back. Signed, been there done that..
#7
Im going to send the heads off this winter to get ported and the chambers re-sized/milled to bump the compression. I can wait that long for a little more umph. I would do it now but I dont think I could stomach the down time, not while the weathers right for ridin.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post