DYNO of 2 into 1
#2
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Passaic County, NJ
Posts: 11,474
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes
on
18 Posts
Just so you know, there won't be much comparison. Different temperatures, dynos, etc will yield different numbers.
I have a thunderheader w/stage 1 a/c. I had a quick 2 runs done last year. Came up at 72hp. Tq was not disclosed. The bike is not tuned.
Stock, you're looking around 65hp on the 96" motor.
I have a thunderheader w/stage 1 a/c. I had a quick 2 runs done last year. Came up at 72hp. Tq was not disclosed. The bike is not tuned.
Stock, you're looking around 65hp on the 96" motor.
#3
#4
best way to get the horizontal lines you talking about will be with a fatcat or a supertrapp supermeg that is tunable. of all the dyno results I have seen, it produces the most torque down low and across the board on our engines. So it will kick up to near max very early and pull till you run out of juice. Also this will be strongly dependent on your cam as well. Andrews T-26 is a good match to this pipe to get that near max torque through 2000-5000 rpm's. Sorry I don't have any links to the dyno sheets I have seen. Different 2-1 will come on in different areas of the rpm band. Also the engine build behind the pipe will matter a lot as well. You are really going to get more from your motor by keeping the current pipes and having a good torque cam installed. Andrews 26, 21, or woods tw6. Gear drive is recommended. Way more bang for the buck with new cams vs changing out to a 2-1. So I would get cams before the new pipe unless you are running stock pipes.
Last edited by rounder; 04-25-2010 at 07:33 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post