Last edit by: IB Advertising
Thug Style / Club Style Dyna pic's
http://www.hdforums.com/forum/dyna-g...yna-pic-s.html
ISSUE
Member Lama is in the process of modding his 2007 FXDC into a club style or thug style bike (known today as outlaw bikes) Asks members to provide inspiration and post pictures of their own bikes. Members show off their bikes.
Read below for the full discussion…
http://www.hdforums.com/forum/dyna-g...yna-pic-s.html
ISSUE
Member Lama is in the process of modding his 2007 FXDC into a club style or thug style bike (known today as outlaw bikes) Asks members to provide inspiration and post pictures of their own bikes. Members show off their bikes.
Read below for the full discussion…
Thug Style / Club Style Dyna pic's
#5141
Thanks man. I wouldn't waste money on a dyno for just a stage 1. Save that money for later down the road if you do cams or other engine mods.
I use a Power Vision. It's really well supported by Dynojet, but from what I've read in the Power Vision thread, fuelmoto provides excellent support for it including custom maps.
If you decide on the PV, I'll be happy to share my maps with you, but it has an auto tune feature so you really only need a good base map to start from. Then you just let Auto Tune dial in the map.
http://www.dynojet.com/PowerVision/
I use a Power Vision. It's really well supported by Dynojet, but from what I've read in the Power Vision thread, fuelmoto provides excellent support for it including custom maps.
If you decide on the PV, I'll be happy to share my maps with you, but it has an auto tune feature so you really only need a good base map to start from. Then you just let Auto Tune dial in the map.
http://www.dynojet.com/PowerVision/
You've spent far more on handlebars, exhausts, fairings, bags, etc...
(like me you've had multiple setups - one set of handlebars nearly pays for your tune)
I also have a PowerVision and while I agree FuelMoto has excellent support and helped by providing good maps their maps combined with my auto tune sessiions DO NOT compare to my dyno tune.
Yes I did gain some more HP & TQ but thats not even what I'm talking about...the smoothness of delivery of power is so much better...the dreaded decel pop is GONE and the bike sounds better.
I ran my bike on the dyno a couple of times to see what the numbers were and to see where I had dips and peaks.
After a dyno tune the dips and peaks were gone, numbers were even better and I'm at or near peak torque from 2200 rpm all the way to 4500 rpm.
good smooth strong USABLE power.
Now THAT is NOT a waste of money!
I've seen some dyno tune results that I would agree were a waste of money - a few peaks - maybe a high max HP number - but at an rpm range you'd never get to - massive dips in the lower range where you actually want power....
Do not overlook the importance of a good tune.
Canned maps and "auto tuning" cannot replace a dyno tune by someone who knows what they are doing.
#5142
I run the d&d fatcat and like it a lot. Looks great sounds great, and performs very well. as american said...you shouldnt have an issue running any exhaust with the longer shocks. I also had to space the muffler on my fatcat out a little. I just got longer bolts and 1/4 inch spacers. very simple and easy.
#5143
I would not call a good dyno tune a "waste of money". You have a $15,000 (or more) machine - how could paying $300 or so for it to run better or more efficiently be a waste?
You've spent far more on handlebars, exhausts, fairings, bags, etc...
(like me you've had multiple setups - one set of handlebars nearly pays for your tune)
I also have a PowerVision and while I agree FuelMoto has excellent support and helped by providing good maps their maps combined with my auto tune sessiions DO NOT compare to my dyno tune.
Yes I did gain some more HP & TQ but thats not even what I'm talking about...the smoothness of delivery of power is so much better...the dreaded decel pop is GONE and the bike sounds better.
I ran my bike on the dyno a couple of times to see what the numbers were and to see where I had dips and peaks.
After a dyno tune the dips and peaks were gone, numbers were even better and I'm at or near peak torque from 2200 rpm all the way to 4500 rpm.
good smooth strong USABLE power.
Now THAT is NOT a waste of money!
I've seen some dyno tune results that I would agree were a waste of money - a few peaks - maybe a high max HP number - but at an rpm range you'd never get to - massive dips in the lower range where you actually want power....
Do not overlook the importance of a good tune.
Canned maps and "auto tuning" cannot replace a dyno tune by someone who knows what they are doing.
You've spent far more on handlebars, exhausts, fairings, bags, etc...
(like me you've had multiple setups - one set of handlebars nearly pays for your tune)
I also have a PowerVision and while I agree FuelMoto has excellent support and helped by providing good maps their maps combined with my auto tune sessiions DO NOT compare to my dyno tune.
Yes I did gain some more HP & TQ but thats not even what I'm talking about...the smoothness of delivery of power is so much better...the dreaded decel pop is GONE and the bike sounds better.
I ran my bike on the dyno a couple of times to see what the numbers were and to see where I had dips and peaks.
After a dyno tune the dips and peaks were gone, numbers were even better and I'm at or near peak torque from 2200 rpm all the way to 4500 rpm.
good smooth strong USABLE power.
Now THAT is NOT a waste of money!
I've seen some dyno tune results that I would agree were a waste of money - a few peaks - maybe a high max HP number - but at an rpm range you'd never get to - massive dips in the lower range where you actually want power....
Do not overlook the importance of a good tune.
Canned maps and "auto tuning" cannot replace a dyno tune by someone who knows what they are doing.
#5144
I would not call a good dyno tune a "waste of money". You have a $15,000 (or more) machine - how could paying $300 or so for it to run better or more efficiently be a waste?
You've spent far more on handlebars, exhausts, fairings, bags, etc...
(like me you've had multiple setups - one set of handlebars nearly pays for your tune)
I also have a PowerVision and while I agree FuelMoto has excellent support and helped by providing good maps their maps combined with my auto tune sessiions DO NOT compare to my dyno tune.
Yes I did gain some more HP & TQ but thats not even what I'm talking about...the smoothness of delivery of power is so much better...the dreaded decel pop is GONE and the bike sounds better.
I ran my bike on the dyno a couple of times to see what the numbers were and to see where I had dips and peaks.
After a dyno tune the dips and peaks were gone, numbers were even better and I'm at or near peak torque from 2200 rpm all the way to 4500 rpm.
good smooth strong USABLE power.
Now THAT is NOT a waste of money!
I've seen some dyno tune results that I would agree were a waste of money - a few peaks - maybe a high max HP number - but at an rpm range you'd never get to - massive dips in the lower range where you actually want power....
Do not overlook the importance of a good tune.
Canned maps and "auto tuning" cannot replace a dyno tune by someone who knows what they are doing.
You've spent far more on handlebars, exhausts, fairings, bags, etc...
(like me you've had multiple setups - one set of handlebars nearly pays for your tune)
I also have a PowerVision and while I agree FuelMoto has excellent support and helped by providing good maps their maps combined with my auto tune sessiions DO NOT compare to my dyno tune.
Yes I did gain some more HP & TQ but thats not even what I'm talking about...the smoothness of delivery of power is so much better...the dreaded decel pop is GONE and the bike sounds better.
I ran my bike on the dyno a couple of times to see what the numbers were and to see where I had dips and peaks.
After a dyno tune the dips and peaks were gone, numbers were even better and I'm at or near peak torque from 2200 rpm all the way to 4500 rpm.
good smooth strong USABLE power.
Now THAT is NOT a waste of money!
I've seen some dyno tune results that I would agree were a waste of money - a few peaks - maybe a high max HP number - but at an rpm range you'd never get to - massive dips in the lower range where you actually want power....
Do not overlook the importance of a good tune.
Canned maps and "auto tuning" cannot replace a dyno tune by someone who knows what they are doing.
#5145
I had my bike dyno'd after my cam job, and I totally agree the tune is way better than what I could have done on my own with the PV. My point was that for just intake and exhaust, it's a bit overkill (IMO) considering the cost since you need to buy a tuner for the dyno anyway. Might as well use the auto tune to dial in the VE and save the $400 for a good dyno after a cam job or heads or whatever down the road. Calling it a waste was a poor choice of words.
If someone was getting cams or other engine work in the near future I agree it would be best to wait so not to pay for the dyno tune twice.
In that case good advice.
If like me you're going to wait until next year to drop in cams I think the $300 I spent was well worth it.
Cheers.
#5146
Thanks for the advise everyone. I do plan to further modify in the not so distant future so I'll probably wait on the dyno. The PV looks pretty sweet. I'm slightly intimidated by its function but I'm sure I'll get it down. Is it fairly easy to install, or should I plan on having it installed professionally?
Any suggestions on where to get a good dyno in SoCal? I'm in Long Beach but when the time comes, I'll be willing to travel a bit to ensure I get a quality job.
Any suggestions on where to get a good dyno in SoCal? I'm in Long Beach but when the time comes, I'll be willing to travel a bit to ensure I get a quality job.
#5149
Yes it is. My bars are 14.5" and the 15" windshield blocks everything just fine. I ran the 18" shield at first, but i got crazy buffeting.
#5150
It's actually $350 at RC Cycles in Hayward.
Dyno Bob is the man in NorCal.
$50 per run with no tuning.