Hitting the 100hp Club with a 96ci

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

#21

02-17-2009, 10:35 PM

archergodwin

Elite HDF Member

Join Date: Sep 2008

Location: Northwest

Posts: 4,440

Likes: 69

Received 148 Likes on 127 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary7

I agree. With the right heads and the right cams, 100 HP at the rear wheel should be no problem for a stock TC96. But what I'd like to see is someone purposely shoot for 100 ft lbs of torque at the rear wheel at say 3000 rpm, with a very flat torque curve, even if it meant a reduction in top end HP. That would be an interesting bike to ride.

Starting with a rebuilt bottom end, pipes with the right amount of backpressure(2 into 1 style), a bit longer and maybe slightly smaller diameter intake, a 'torque-centric' cam (don't have lift/duration on the top of my head) and then some head work, and 10:1 comp pistons, and a good remap.

.... might be a good place to start.... just my opinion.

Last edited by archergodwin; 02-17-2009 at 10:37 PM.

Reply Like

#22

02-17-2009, 10:38 PM

archergodwin

Elite HDF Member

Join Date: Sep 2008

Location: Northwest

Posts: 4,440

Likes: 69

Received 148 Likes on 127 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by chad peterson

Exactly what I aimed for with my 95", fell just short at 98tq at 3,000rpm's

Chad, what's the lift/duration numbers on your cams?

Reply Like

#23

02-17-2009, 11:03 PM

chad peterson

Road Master

Join Date: Jan 2007

Location:

Posts: 1,221

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by archergodwin

Chad, what's the lift/duration numbers on your cams?

.590 lift, intake close 44, intake duration 246, ex. 248

Reply Like

#24

02-17-2009, 11:31 PM

Gary7

Road Warrior

Join Date: Dec 2008

Location: Upstate, SC

Posts: 1,530

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Quote:

Originally Posted by chad peterson

.590 lift, intake close 44, intake duration 246, ex. 248

How does that compare with the lift and duration of the stock cams in the TC96?

Reply Like

#25

02-17-2009, 11:40 PM

qtrracer

Ultimate HDF Member

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: SoCal

Posts: 6,532

Likes: 96

Received 131 Likes on 104 Posts

Hillside says they can get 98 hp out of an 06 Dyna without changing the cams, and thats an 88" motor so 100 hp should be no problem with a 95"BB

Reply Like

#26

02-17-2009, 11:46 PM

archergodwin

Elite HDF Member

Join Date: Sep 2008

Location: Northwest

Posts: 4,440

Likes: 69

Received 148 Likes on 127 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary7

How does that compare with the lift and duration of the stock cams in the TC96?

If the 96" motor from '06 and up have the same then Andrews has the stock specs on this sheet:

http://www.andrewsproducts.com/motor...nDriveCams.htm

Reply Like

#27

02-17-2009, 11:47 PM

chad peterson

Road Master

Join Date: Jan 2007

Location:

Posts: 1,221

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by qtrracer

Hillside says they can get 98 hp out of an 06 Dyna without changing the cams, and thats an 88" motor so 100 hp should be no problem with a 95"BB

Has got to be a misunderstanding here! 98 hp stock cams, I don't think so!

Reply Like

#28

02-17-2009, 11:52 PM

qtrracer

Ultimate HDF Member

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: SoCal

Posts: 6,532

Likes: 96

Received 131 Likes on 104 Posts

No misunderstanding , read it on v-twin forums discussing stock cams. Said the 06 is a unique cammed bike , did headwork, 2-1, soforth . Owner wanted stock cam build.

Reply Like

#29

02-18-2009, 12:05 AM

qtrracer

Ultimate HDF Member

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: SoCal

Posts: 6,532

Likes: 96

Received 131 Likes on 104 Posts

Just reread the thread now, no misunderstanding , Scott also thought there might be more left with tuning. Oh he put on high ratio roller rockers 1.725 I believe.

Reply Like