Dyna vs Sportster
#1
Dyna vs Sportster
Not in a power contest or showdown, but as bikes overall. Is the Dyna just a BT version of a Sportster?
I want a touring bike, but at 5'5" Or so (now, used to 5'7") with a 29" inseam, I wonder if the touring bikes will be to difficult to handle maneuvering to park. Not the actual rolling part, even slow speed I think I will be fine that way. Rather more like backing in parking spaces etc. if its a little uphill, which I try to avoid, the touring bikes are a lot of bike to push around.
For the record I will be 67 in a month or so, and weigh 180, and in decent shape.
I want a touring bike, but at 5'5" Or so (now, used to 5'7") with a 29" inseam, I wonder if the touring bikes will be to difficult to handle maneuvering to park. Not the actual rolling part, even slow speed I think I will be fine that way. Rather more like backing in parking spaces etc. if its a little uphill, which I try to avoid, the touring bikes are a lot of bike to push around.
For the record I will be 67 in a month or so, and weigh 180, and in decent shape.
#3
#4
The following 4 users liked this post by Graham UK:
#5
I have ridden big twins, one a 2019 SGS, and the other a full on custom, with a 106" engine, that felt and handled like my sportster, only heavier, and a LOT more powerful. The SGS was a 20 mile test ride from a local dealer, and frankly the worst part of that ride was backing up, mainly due to the width at the clutch pak.
I am sure the personalities of the Dyna vs Sportster, are a lot different. I even wondered about a switchback but those saddlebags look tiny compared to, say a Road King or other touring bike, My reason for a touring bike is to occasionally tour, with the wife. That said, our tours would most likely be a few days ride, tops. So something with side bags, and would like a detachable tour pak. That was one reason I rode the SGS. It, would need a better seat and tour pak, of course. Then there is the Road King, but I think I would prefer the fairing vs the windshield. No plans on removing windshield, so that is not an issue. Have ridden both ways, and prefer the wind brake vs naked, and prefer the fairing over windshield.
The Road King would also need what the SG would need, with possible exception of different seat.
What year did HD stop making Dynas? I use my saddlebags nearly every time I ride, so those are a must. That is why they are on the sporty as well. Even thought about a tour pak for the sporty and just keeping it, but a little more seat room would be nice.
Is there more seat room, for 2 up, on a Dyna vs the Sportster?
I am sure the personalities of the Dyna vs Sportster, are a lot different. I even wondered about a switchback but those saddlebags look tiny compared to, say a Road King or other touring bike, My reason for a touring bike is to occasionally tour, with the wife. That said, our tours would most likely be a few days ride, tops. So something with side bags, and would like a detachable tour pak. That was one reason I rode the SGS. It, would need a better seat and tour pak, of course. Then there is the Road King, but I think I would prefer the fairing vs the windshield. No plans on removing windshield, so that is not an issue. Have ridden both ways, and prefer the wind brake vs naked, and prefer the fairing over windshield.
The Road King would also need what the SG would need, with possible exception of different seat.
What year did HD stop making Dynas? I use my saddlebags nearly every time I ride, so those are a must. That is why they are on the sporty as well. Even thought about a tour pak for the sporty and just keeping it, but a little more seat room would be nice.
Is there more seat room, for 2 up, on a Dyna vs the Sportster?
#6
I assume that was a pretty easy transition too, since the low rider is almost a copy, with a bigger engine. This was the custom I rode. Logged sbout 120 miles on it.
The following users liked this post:
Chicago Ken (04-06-2020)
#9
I have both bikes, the best way to sum it up is: when riding the Sportster you sit ON it, when riding the Dyna you sit IN it. If you plan on taking any trips, you will enjoy the Dyna. The power band is different with the big twin. It just feels better. You feel more like being a part of the bike. That is at least my take on it. YD
The following 2 users liked this post by Yankee Dog:
Bluesrider.df (04-20-2020),
cliffd (02-15-2021)
#10
Yankee dog
A friend of mine in TN has an older softtail, and that was how he described it too. He also has a 2000 sportster, but like the softtail better and plans on selling the sportster.
Toecutter
I am really not opposed to other brands, totally, BUT when I looked into a Goldwing, finding out the clutch is in the back of the engine, and that its supposed to remove the engine to replace it. Thst was a deal breaker for me. Also that it takes about an hour to replace the air filter.
A friend of mine in TN has an older softtail, and that was how he described it too. He also has a 2000 sportster, but like the softtail better and plans on selling the sportster.
Toecutter
I am really not opposed to other brands, totally, BUT when I looked into a Goldwing, finding out the clutch is in the back of the engine, and that its supposed to remove the engine to replace it. Thst was a deal breaker for me. Also that it takes about an hour to replace the air filter.