Best quality front end options for Dyna
#22
Thanks.. The spread sheet shows me that your Nm is really Newtons per Millimeter so I can punch the numbers out on a calculator. Don't need the spreadsheet..
With that in mind.. 0.85 N/mm is way light.. Are you sure you don't mean 8.5 N/mm? Or Kg/mm?
How much travel does the busa front end have?
With that in mind.. 0.85 N/mm is way light.. Are you sure you don't mean 8.5 N/mm? Or Kg/mm?
How much travel does the busa front end have?
#23
Well, Still think it's light.. Here is you calculator..
0.85 kg/mm would be even a bit light if the travel was say 100mm.. The FXR I have has approximately 1.0kg/mm springs in the Paioli forks and really only about 100mm travel (110 with bottoming hydraulics).. It's borderline on rough roads.. Great on smoother controlled surfaces tho.. But I'm not an expert.
0.85 kg/mm would be even a bit light if the travel was say 100mm.. The FXR I have has approximately 1.0kg/mm springs in the Paioli forks and really only about 100mm travel (110 with bottoming hydraulics).. It's borderline on rough roads.. Great on smoother controlled surfaces tho.. But I'm not an expert.
#24
Well, Still think it's light.. Here is you calculator..
0.85 kg/mm would be even a bit light if the travel was say 100mm.. The FXR I have has approximately 1.0kg/mm springs in the Paioli forks and really only about 100mm travel (110 with bottoming hydraulics).. It's borderline on rough roads.. Great on smoother controlled surfaces tho.. But I'm not an expert.
0.85 kg/mm would be even a bit light if the travel was say 100mm.. The FXR I have has approximately 1.0kg/mm springs in the Paioli forks and really only about 100mm travel (110 with bottoming hydraulics).. It's borderline on rough roads.. Great on smoother controlled surfaces tho.. But I'm not an expert.
The following users liked this post:
Max Headflow (10-11-2016)
#25
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post