Dyna Glide Models Super Glide, Super Glide Sport, Super Glide Custom, Dyna Glide Convertible, Super Glide T-Sport, Dyna Glide Police, Dyna Switchback, Low Rider, Street Bob, Fat Bob and Wide Glide.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

124" winter build...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #71  
Old 12-18-2014 | 11:33 PM
monster715's Avatar
monster715
Thread Starter
|
Road Warrior
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 15
From: Bay area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by HD Pilot
No, it is an additive change - going smaller on the front pulley is the same as going big on the rear pulley except 1 tooth on the front = 2 teeth on the back(approximately). You are compressing your gears by both of the mods, so you will shift at lower speeds but your acceleration to these speeds will be quicker. Top speed will be reduced, so if you heart is set on cruising at 80+ mph, ypu might want to reconsider.
Well ****.. I haven't messed with sprocket changes since bmx days and I guess I remembered backwards... I'm going to stick with the 30t for now. The 70t rear won't be here in time to PC with this batch so maybe I'll stick with the 66t rear for break in and see how it feels. Could still try the 70t later and switch it back if I don't like it. She might wheelie with no clutch lol. Learn something everyday haha
 
  #72  
Old 12-19-2014 | 11:12 AM
mattVA's Avatar
mattVA
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,066
Likes: 96
From: Northern VA
Default

I did the 30T first, bought a 70T rear and never put it on. I just like the 30/66 too much to mess with it. What I liked most about the change is it revs faster. I think more of the engine torque makes it to the rear wheel as well when I was reading up on gearing formulas.
 
  #73  
Old 12-19-2014 | 04:38 PM
C.H.L.'s Avatar
C.H.L.
Road Warrior
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 28
From: Houston, TX
Default

I love this thread :-)

I'm working on a 117" build now.

As of right now, Wolfgang Grasser in Baytown, TX has done a set of heads for me.

Now I'm saving for a S&S 117 kit (new crankshaft, 117 cylinders & Pistons)...

Probably gonna keep my 777 cam, (but might go with a hi lift cam)...
And probably stick with stock throttle body (have Wolfgang Polish it a bit)....

Until I get parts, and have him assemble it - I'm living through your thread :-)
 
  #74  
Old 12-19-2014 | 04:45 PM
HD Bobber's Avatar
HD Bobber
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,557
Likes: 202
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by mattVA
I did the 30T first, bought a 70T rear and never put it on. I just like the 30/66 too much to mess with it. What I liked most about the change is it revs faster. I think more of the engine torque makes it to the rear wheel as well when I was reading up on gearing formulas.
If you like you 30/66 you don't know what you are missing with the 30/70.....you will like it that much more.
 
  #75  
Old 12-19-2014 | 04:54 PM
monster715's Avatar
monster715
Thread Starter
|
Road Warrior
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 15
From: Bay area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by C.H.L.
I love this thread :-)

I'm working on a 117" build now.

As of right now, Wolfgang Grasser in Baytown, TX has done a set of heads for me.

Now I'm saving for a S&S 117 kit (new crankshaft, 117 cylinders & Pistons)...

Probably gonna keep my 777 cam, (but might go with a hi lift cam)...
And probably stick with stock throttle body (have Wolfgang Polish it a bit)....

Until I get parts, and have him assemble it - I'm living through your thread :-)
If your going with the s&s crankshaft why not go 124"? Same price.. Don't get me wrong I'm not knocking your build at all. Just curious why? I was going to do the same thing, mainly because the 124" number kinda makes me nervous haha. I tried to let Kirby talk me into a 117" but in the end it's the same price for either crank. I'm going to be looking for your thread also where are you going to post it?
 
  #76  
Old 12-19-2014 | 05:09 PM
C.H.L.'s Avatar
C.H.L.
Road Warrior
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 28
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by monster715
If your going with the s&s crankshaft why not go 124"? Same price.. Don't get me wrong I'm not knocking your build at all. Just curious why? I was going to do the same thing, mainly because the 124" number kinda makes me nervous haha. I tried to let Kirby talk me into a 117" but in the end it's the same price for either crank. I'm going to be looking for your thread also where are you going to post it?

A lot later than I wish haha

Probably gonna be a year or more before I save up for parts and labor.

Dependability was why 117. NOT saying the 124 isn't, but Wolfgang said the stroke of the 117 was a tried and proven stroke. I didn't talk to him much about it to be honest. He suggested it over the 117 for long rides, and I said let's do it.

I also think I'll be plenty happy with the power. I'm ALMOST happy with my stock 103 with a 777 cam. I should be plenty happy with a 117 and head work.

But it'll be 6 months+ before I order parts. You have plenty of time to talk me into 124 haha
 
  #77  
Old 12-19-2014 | 05:13 PM
monster715's Avatar
monster715
Thread Starter
|
Road Warrior
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 15
From: Bay area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by C.H.L.
A lot later than I wish haha

Probably gonna be a year or more before I save up for parts and labor.

Dependability was why 117. NOT saying the 124 isn't, but Wolfgang said the stroke of the 117 was a tried and proven stroke. I didn't talk to him much about it to be honest. He suggested it over the 117 for long rides, and I said let's do it.

I also think I'll be plenty happy with the power. I'm ALMOST happy with my stock 103 with a 777 cam. I should be plenty happy with a 117 and head work.

But it'll be 6 months+ before I order parts. You have plenty of time to talk me into 124 haha
Haha no way man I don't know enough about it yet to start talking people into or out of anything. I asked Kirby about the longer stroke also but he said that you don't even start having issues til you get up to 4-3/4" stroke. But yea man I think you'll be plenty happy with the 117". Id say trust your motor guy and go with what he recommends. That's what I did
 
  #78  
Old 12-20-2014 | 09:38 PM
dirtdobber's Avatar
dirtdobber
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,749
Likes: 15
From: sand mountain Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by mattVA
I did the 30T first, bought a 70T rear and never put it on. I just like the 30/66 too much to mess with it. What I liked most about the change is it revs faster. I think more of the engine torque makes it to the rear wheel as well when I was reading up on gearing formulas.
That is why I went with 113. If built right they will rev like a crotch rocket and when you hit it hits real quick in any gear.
i have around what you are looking at, 124hp/148tq.
I eat rear tires, 2 to 3 sets a year. What I like is cruising at 60mph and all you have to do to pass is roll on some throttle. want to pass real fast gear down to 5th, if that isn't fast enough go to 4th and hold on.

Personally I think you will have better times @ the strip with the factory gearing.

You will have all the low end you want, and then some.
 
  #79  
Old 12-20-2014 | 09:56 PM
HD Bobber's Avatar
HD Bobber
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,557
Likes: 202
From: Illinois
Default

Damn dirt bobber 148tq is an insane number. Man I would love to take'er out to show me a good time!
 
  #80  
Old 12-20-2014 | 10:07 PM
Suede Blue Man's Avatar
Suede Blue Man
HDF Community Team
Veteran: Army
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,530
Likes: 770
From: Out West
Community Team
Default

Originally Posted by dirtdobber
...
i have around what you are looking at, 124hp/148tq.
...
All of the sudden, I feel like I got a 2" ****.
 


Quick Reply: 124" winter build...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 AM.