hidden antenna - loss of reception?
#21
In the relatively urban/suburban, hilly area I live (20 miles outside of NYC), the J&M internal gives me slightly better reception than the stock whip antenna for NYC stations. I know it's slightly better because with the stock I could not get my favorite station in the garage. With the J&M, that station comes in fine in the garage.
With either antenna, reception on the bike is approximately the same as both of my cars (Audi and Jeep). I don't see the Infotainment reception being any better or worse in my area than any other vehicle.
#23
#24
#25
With the Boom hidden antenna, you'll lose a little. If you're already marginal on reception it will be noticeable, i.e., static and interference. If you're closer to the stations you normally listen to and have a strong signal already you might not notice a difference.
Harley advertises the hidden antenna does better in some regards than the stock antenna. In my case that wasn't so. But it wasn't a lot worse so I left it be (the hidden antenna, that is).
Alan
Harley advertises the hidden antenna does better in some regards than the stock antenna. In my case that wasn't so. But it wasn't a lot worse so I left it be (the hidden antenna, that is).
Alan
#27
I tried both the passive and active antennas and neither worked as well as the stock. The shorty antenna was also useless in my area. I think you need to be near a large metropolitan area for any replacement antenna to work properly. I am about halfway between Philly and New York cities in NJ and the only thing that works properly for me is the stock antenna.
#28
#29
There sure are a lot of differing opinions on this issue, lol. Fact is the stock antenna is going to give the best results, but looks like crap. It has a lot to do with the correct length. There was a thread in here where some members had bent the stock antenna toward the front of the bike along the frame and the results were good.