Hmm, really good #'s can't get that out of mine, maybe i got a bad tuner

 

No one is saying those aren't great numbers. So, I don't know who you're referring to as "doubters", but the results are not what you would see if they were corrected to SAE, which is how most dyno sheets are published. From the link I posted:

 

I apologize for that, my bad. Thought I edited out my remark. Will take care of that now.

 

I reached out to my tuner and will be getting a SAE corrected graph, he recently updated the dyno jet wp8 software and did not notice that the scale was not properly setup after the update. The SAE corrected graph will show a 2hp and 3tq decrease, still impressive and without the aid of a cam. We are fortunate in San Diego to have such a talented tuner in Mikey at Performance Choppers. I was somewhat apprehensive about getting a dyno but after talking with and meeting Mikey I knew the outcome would be very positive.

 

He may be a good tuner, but I just watched a video he posted of him tuning a bagger..... He was stomping on the shifter like he was trying to kill giant cockroaches, and then immediately after it returned to idle from a dyno pull, he shut it right down.

I wouldn't want anyone treating my bike that way.....

 

I'm going down next week to talk to him and watch him do a Dyno.

 

 

Read original post!

 

Here is the SAE corrected version of my dyno tune. As a previous poster pointed out these results pretty much are what Fuel Moto has posted on their website for a similarly configured bike.

 

I hate to be a hater but, I have to agree with Baff here. A stock 103 just wont/cant produce those kind of numbers, no matter who is doing the tune. I'm close to those numbers but I've had engine work done. I'm not quite sure how to compare one guy turning as opposed to another but, my guy has forgotten more about anything Harley than most folks will ever know.