2014-2023 Touring Models This Section Is For Rushmore/2014-2023 Touring Models
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What cam would you recommend?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 06-14-2015 | 11:13 AM
tpcowfish's Avatar
tpcowfish
Road Warrior
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 193
From: ohio
Default

I too was looking at the 57, but a call to Gary at Andrews, he recommended the 54 over 57 on these new 103's, Just thought i would share that, I"m not a cam guru,
 
  #12  
Old 06-14-2015 | 11:32 AM
Gwaxley's Avatar
Gwaxley
Road Warrior
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 36
From: Lafayette La
Default

Originally Posted by tpcowfish
I too was looking at the 57, but a call to Gary at Andrews, he recommended the 54 over 57 on these new 103's, Just thought i would share that, I"m not a cam guru,
Humm, I would check this for miscommunication. The 103 twin cooled is 10.1 compression the none twin cooled is not.
I have nothing to do with GMR but here's a custom grind from Andrews. GMRs website has some dyno charts posted and from my experience with Steve he will tell you straight-up good info. There's anotherother forum with great dyno info from guys that perform dynos daily with no bs. Just sayin
 
Attached Thumbnails What cam would you recommend?-image.jpg  
  #13  
Old 06-14-2015 | 11:41 AM
zeke383's Avatar
zeke383
Road Captain
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 631
Likes: 17
From: Finger Lakes NY
Default

Originally Posted by WG2011
So the se204 how would that compare to say the Andrews 57h?
204 comes in a bit earlier. I know it's a 2012 but I went from the 204 to the 57h chasing a bit more power....I was disappointed. After bumping compression and doing head work I am happy though. I would think a wethead would do well with the 57h but the other rushmores I would say 204
 
  #14  
Old 06-14-2015 | 11:43 AM
zeke383's Avatar
zeke383
Road Captain
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 631
Likes: 17
From: Finger Lakes NY
Default

Originally Posted by tpcowfish
I too was looking at the 57, but a call to Gary at Andrews, he recommended the 54 over 57 on these new 103's, Just thought i would share that, I"m not a cam guru,
Gary seems to be all over the place with his recommendations....
 
  #15  
Old 06-14-2015 | 11:52 AM
05FLHTC's Avatar
05FLHTC
Cruiser
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 207
Likes: 3
From: N/A
Default

Gary's got into the booze cabinet if ya ask me...

Try this on for size...advance the 57 with using +4 gear...now you have a SE204 on steroids.
 
  #16  
Old 06-14-2015 | 11:53 AM
Bikerscum's Avatar
Bikerscum
Road Master
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 9
From: SF Bay area
Default

I should have mentioned I have a wethead, going with the 57H. The compression is a little higher.
 
  #17  
Old 06-14-2015 | 12:52 PM
WG2011's Avatar
WG2011
Thread Starter
|
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 18
From: Savage, MN
Default

Oh got it, obviously being a street glide no wet heads here but I'm still reading a lot of good results even with the SG's
 
  #18  
Old 06-14-2015 | 12:58 PM
WG2011's Avatar
WG2011
Thread Starter
|
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 18
From: Savage, MN
Default

Kuryakn TC-24d could be in the running as well
 
  #19  
Old 06-14-2015 | 03:35 PM
Marty33's Avatar
Marty33
Cruiser
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 225
Likes: 23
From: Oakdale , CA
Default

Check out the S&S 551c cam. Drop in bagger cam, low to mid range torque beast. I love it. Its no slouch on the top end either.
 
  #20  
Old 06-14-2015 | 04:20 PM
Tedwilliams09's Avatar
Tedwilliams09
Road Captain
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 627
Likes: 47
From: Nunda
Default

The se585 I just put in my streetglide are very torquey... Seem to come in a tad later then my 255's
 


Quick Reply: What cam would you recommend?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 AM.