I too was looking at the 57, but a call to Gary at Andrews, he recommended the 54 over 57 on these new 103's, Just thought i would share that, I"m not a cam guru,
I too was looking at the 57, but a call to Gary at Andrews, he recommended the 54 over 57 on these new 103's, Just thought i would share that, I"m not a cam guru,
Humm, I would check this for miscommunication. The 103 twin cooled is 10.1 compression the none twin cooled is not.
I have nothing to do with GMR but here's a custom grind from Andrews. GMRs website has some dyno charts posted and from my experience with Steve he will tell you straight-up good info. There's anotherother forum with great dyno info from guys that perform dynos daily with no bs. Just sayin
So the se204 how would that compare to say the Andrews 57h?
204 comes in a bit earlier. I know it's a 2012 but I went from the 204 to the 57h chasing a bit more power....I was disappointed. After bumping compression and doing head work I am happy though. I would think a wethead would do well with the 57h but the other rushmores I would say 204
I too was looking at the 57, but a call to Gary at Andrews, he recommended the 54 over 57 on these new 103's, Just thought i would share that, I"m not a cam guru,
Gary seems to be all over the place with his recommendations....