You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join HDForums.com community today!
Well I had another wrinkle I did not mention. I was thinking about new cams and pipes. They told me a had a SERT installed (I did not know this and neither did the salesperson) and I would need connectors to make adjustments on the dyno. They are "married" to the VIN of the bike on the first dyno run. The previous owner did not choose to include them so I was looking at having to buy a new SERT if I wanted to make changes or ANY other changes to the motor in the future. I chose just to do the hydraulic tensioner.
The story does have a happy ending; they did find the previous owner and after this much time he still had the SERT connectors so I have them now!!!!! I guess I was lucky.
Quote:
Originally Posted by iclick
Don't hold your breath for a recall, but I think you made the right decision if you plan on keeping the bike for the long-term. I had my cam-plate out on my '07 recently to upgrade cams to SE255's and at 25k the tensioners showed only some minor wear marks. I'd have to say that <5% of the material was worn on either one and I obviously didn't replace them, so my guess is that the problem is fixed.
As for wear on early TC's, I see no consistency from bike to bike. I've seen some go out at 20k and one friend had his checked for the first time at 70k, only after I nagged him to death with warnings of impending doom, which in his case was in the nick of time. I believe wear is a matter of quality control on the tensioner material more than any other factor, as the type or brand of oil doesn't seem to matter.
I second the idea of changing cams while you're in there, as that should add only a small amount of time to the job and cost very little more than the cost of the cams. Also, pull the old INA inner bearings and install some Timkins (B-148), <$15 for the bearings and maybe 10 min. of shop time. Yes, you'll have to buy a tuner, but a dyno tune is only required for some tuning options.
I had mine checked at the 30K service and the tech told me they were in great shape. I made the service writer document what the tech said, so if they fail I may have some recourse with the dealer...yeah right
stacy
was told that it matters on how the bike is ridin.....agressive and or alot of lugging will cause them to wear faster.....but who knows.....
Why would "lugging" have an effect on the tensioners? I can see where aggressive operation would cause RPM's to stay higher on average, and that would make a difference.
__________________ 2007 Street Ultra
Stage 1½: Fuel Moto Power Package, SE255 cams.
Go with the Hydrolic tensioners. They will last much longer than the spring. I just replaced spring loaded tensioners on a friends 05 RG w/ 30K miles. The pad was worn completely thru on the inner tensioner. You don't need geared cams unless you plan on doing extreme engine mods which it does not sound like you are going to do. Even the inner bearings are fine unless you plan on high HP upgrades. The crank is not going to flex with a "stock" set up. Best of luck. $800 seems very high for the amount of work required.
Why would "lugging" have an effect on the tensioners? I can see where aggressive operation would cause RPM's to stay higher on average, and that would make a difference.
i have no idea about the "lugging" part.....I never done the research. I was told that at the local dealer when I bought the parts to do the job....I asked the service mgr about the job and I also had some cam questions....hell he acted like there is no issues with the cam chain tensioner shoes, which kinda suprised me with all thats said about them on here (maybe he's in denial??) I told him my bike just turned 30k and that I was getting kinda worried about them, he also couldn't give me any cam advice either (since I'm in there I may as well swap out the cams as well)......oh well, I was just sayin what was said to me is all....
__________________ "Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."
James Dean
When I went into my engine to do the re-build (gear drive, cams, etc.) my outside guide looked great but the inner was in pieces, parts had gone thru the oil pump, had to replace, clean out the engine completely (I hope). They both had been replaced less that 20K miles before the rebuild. The way they come from the factory is "junk", after seeing what happens when they wear thru I could never trust the stock set-up again. I was lucky enough to have a crank within run-out limits, my gear drive is not much louder than stock.
I went with the hydraulic ones. I bet there was more money tacked on the parts price since I was sticking them with the labor cost. I bet the labor cost is a set amount for the job performed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hellmut73
Go with the Hydrolic tensioners. They will last much longer than the spring. I just replaced spring loaded tensioners on a friends 05 RG w/ 30K miles. The pad was worn completely thru on the inner tensioner. You don't need geared cams unless you plan on doing extreme engine mods which it does not sound like you are going to do. Even the inner bearings are fine unless you plan on high HP upgrades. The crank is not going to flex with a "stock" set up. Best of luck. $800 seems very high for the amount of work required.
