Harley Davidson Forums
Harley Davidson Forums - Harley Davidson Classifieds - HDForums.com Photo Galleries - Create an Account - Harley Davidson News

Go Back   Harley Davidson Forums > Harley Davidson Motorcycles > Touring Models

Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by: Fuel Moto USA


Welcome to HDForums.com!
Welcome to HDForums.com.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join HDForums.com community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-27-2009, 06:12 PM
gregsdart gregsdart is offline
Hang Around
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 68
Default Torque/hp Gains? this is my plan

First off, I am interested in roll on power from 1,800 rpm on, to 4500 or so. This is a two up touring bike, 2008 roadking. I have purchased SE 255 cams, and would like to go with a 103 size by overbore and new pistons.
The bike currently has the ComanderIII , Jackpot mufflers and aircleaner from Fuelmoto, which has provided a very nice increase.
What should I expect from the cams and cubes, along with some mild headwork to help out the stock heads? I don't plan on spending a lot on the heads, as I want the power down low and figure that some basic bowl porting and a better valvejob should do the trick. I will however take the time to set the quench properly by using the right gasket thickness or milling the cylinders to make it all work well together. Any info appreciated. Greg
This ad is not displayed to registered and logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on HD Forums!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-27-2009, 06:41 PM
MNPGRider's Avatar
MNPGRider MNPGRider is online now
Outstanding HDF Member
2006 Harley-Davidson Ultra Classic
My Garage
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SW Minnesota
Posts: 2,560
Default

Read the current issue (labeled July 2009) of American Iron that just came. Donny Peterson did a great article on how to improve the TC96 with valve and head work.
__________________
None of us can do everything, but we can all do something. That's why I am a Patriot Guard Rider. Iron Butt Association # 34783 SaddleSore 1000 in 2008
'06 Ultra, Screaming Eagle Air Cleaner, Stage One download,
Andrews 21G's (Joe Minton, American Rider), Boyeson X-Wing (American Iron test reports)
Stage Two modified stock pipes by ebay seller TKEMPLE
49 MPG @ 60 mph, 44 MPG @ 65 mph, 3367 mile mountain trip @70mph 42.89mpg
'75 Trident T150, '76 Trident T160 (see My Garage for pics!)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-27-2009, 07:43 PM
gregsdart gregsdart is offline
Hang Around
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 68
Default Thanks

Great. Thanks for the info on the head work. That will be a great help. Greg
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-28-2009, 02:33 PM
iclick's Avatar
iclick iclick is online now
Ultimate HDF Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 6,444
Default

You might want to install the cam first and try it with the TC96 and Fuel Moto gear, as adding the cams to what you already have will give you a nice bump in the low-end and midrange, and based on my bike's result I think that combo is a good match-up. I have the 255's, PCV-AT, AC, and Jackpots with 1.75" right baffle--basically the same setup as you. Be prepared for an exhaust-noise increase, as was expected, and this prompted me to install a smaller right-side baffle to quieten it up a bit. It's still pretty throaty but is close enough, and I didn't notice any performance decrease with the smaller baffle. In theory it should increase the low-end and possibly clip the top-end a hair.

Jamie at Fuel Moto has dynoed numerous 103's and claims there isn't a big difference between 103 and 96 all other factors being equal, maybe a few HP. Since it is a bore increase I wouldn't expect low-end TQ to increase much either. Give Jamie a call and I'm sure he'll have some numbers to share.
__________________
2007 Street Ultra
Stage 1½: Fuel Moto Power Package, SE255 cams.

http://www.iclickphotos.com/Motorcycle/0000-080702-04aLH-Bike.jpg
Link to larger image
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-28-2009, 09:44 PM
emwolb emwolb is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: eastern oklahoma
Posts: 2,675
Default

mnpg that tw 21 cam is supposed to be great for low end torque and starts dropping off at five thousand, so i understand. mine rarely sees five k, as it's designed to be a torque motor. i'm gonna use the tw 21, 26, or the se 255 cams myself. don't need the hi rev help, as i don't ride it there. heck, if i wanted revs, i'd have got a gsxr suzuki, yeow, slap me please and bring me back to my senses.
__________________
Jim Barnhart
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-28-2009, 10:11 PM
dirtdobber's Avatar
dirtdobber dirtdobber is offline
Road Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: sand mountain Alabama
Posts: 1,473
Default

I agree with iclick.
He did his with the SE 255 cams and it did good, he has been around for some time and is a helpful member here.
By his suggestion that is what I did, cams first. Although our set ups differ I am very happy with mine. I did the cams at 30,000 miles, my body does not cooperate enough to do the cams myself. Since my cam chains had to be checked it ended up costing me $50 for the cam install.
Pulls 6th gear good now with good mpg.
__________________
http://bigbikeriders.com/photopost/data/500/medium/7988IMG_1875_edited-1_Small_.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-28-2009, 10:31 PM
HarleyDawg HarleyDawg is offline
Prospect
2007 Harley Davidson Ultra Classic
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iclick View Post
You might want to install the cam first and try it with the TC96 and Fuel Moto gear, as adding the cams to what you already have will give you a nice bump in the low-end and midrange, and based on my bike's result I think that combo is a good match-up. I have the 255's, PCV-AT, AC, and Jackpots with 1.75" right baffle--basically the same setup as you. Be prepared for an exhaust-noise increase, as was expected, and this prompted me to install a smaller right-side baffle to quieten it up a bit. It's still pretty throaty but is close enough, and I didn't notice any performance decrease with the smaller baffle. In theory it should increase the low-end and possibly clip the top-end a hair.

Jamie at Fuel Moto has dynoed numerous 103's and claims there isn't a big difference between 103 and 96 all other factors being equal, maybe a few HP. Since it is a bore increase I wouldn't expect low-end TQ to increase much either. Give Jamie a call and I'm sure he'll have some numbers to share.
Iclick, any ideal what your HP and TQ numbers are with this setup?
__________________
2007 Ultra Classic
SE Slip ons
Nightrider's XIED's
Patriot Guard Rider
As you slide down the banister of life, may
The splinters never point the wrong way...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-29-2009, 03:48 PM
gregsdart gregsdart is offline
Hang Around
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 68
Default Great info

Thanks for the feedback, and would like to hear results from as many as possible. It is good to hear it may not be worth the trouble to go 103, maybe the head work will be plenty. Improving headflow may not give a large improvement down low, but would probably stretch the rpm range on the top side and gain power up there without sacrificing low speed performance.
If I can run a tighter head to piston distance, that should help a lot as well. Just for grins, here are the cam specs for the stocker 08 RK 96 TC motor, and the SE255

stock intake 195 * exhaust 222 *
se255 intake 211* exhaust 235*
Events for both cams;

stock int -9*btdc 25*abdc ex 42* bbdc -3* atdc

se255 int 6*btdc 25*abdc ex 48* bbdc 7* atdc

Notice that the SE cam has exactly the same intake closing point as the stocker. That is a good thing for me, as I want the same rev range, just more of it. Extra power is gained by the .550 lift vs .480? stock, and increasing valve overlap (exhaust closing, intake opening) by 13*. Overall duration is more performance driven than emissions driven, from my perspective.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-29-2009, 05:23 PM
iclick's Avatar
iclick iclick is online now
Ultimate HDF Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 6,444
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarleyDawg View Post
Iclick, any ideal what your HP and TQ numbers are with this setup?
I've been asked this several times since doing the cam install and can only give you a guess based on where I know the bike to have been before and my buttometer. That known info would be dyno charts on a stock TC96 with the same Fuel Moto mods, which was 78HP and 94TQ. Right now I'd guess HP is somewhere in the low-80's, perhaps 82-ish, and TQ at or very near 100.

I was thinking today while riding that I almost never need more than 1/2 throttle to do anything, even passing, and revving past 4K is unnecessary with this much power on tap. Don't get me wrong, the 255's are not the choice of drag racers since they don't make prodigious HP numbers, but I can't imagine a bolt-in cam that will produce this much usable low-end TQ without doing any engine mods.

I haven't done a dyno run on the bike mainly because I don't need the info, but I do know that my expectations were at least met with this upgrade. Since some negative side-effects that were expected didn't happen, e.g. increased valve-train noise, it makes the result even more pleasing.
__________________
2007 Street Ultra
Stage 1½: Fuel Moto Power Package, SE255 cams.

http://www.iclickphotos.com/Motorcycle/0000-080702-04aLH-Bike.jpg
Link to larger image
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-29-2009, 05:53 PM
mps1168's Avatar
mps1168 mps1168 is offline
Prospect
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 237
Default

I went to 103 and had head work done, port polish and bigger valves, adj pushrods and andrews 54h cam, comp close to 9.5-9.8, no decomps needed and no pinging issues. I already had SERT and SE AC, use stock headers into "old School" se slip ons. At this point dont have it "dyno'd" yet but riding 2 up I can really tell it has some giddy up over the 96. Riding solo I now am constanly catching myself going near 70-75 with no effort on the throttle at all. Bike starts and runs great, to me well worth having it done.

When i finally get on a dyno I'll report back. Jamie at Fuel Moto's new shop is minutes from me so thats who will be doing any dyno tune...YES he does tune SERT too.

mps
__________________
2007 Ultra Classic Black, SE A/C, SERT, SE Slip ons ,98s,Chrome front end, LED Trunk Spoiler, wrap around truck chrome,painted inner fairing, Hog Tunes speakers, Legend Air Suspension, man does it ride sweet but now I am beginning to suspect their customer service and warranty after I've had the shocks back for repairs twice in a year.

NEW FOR 09,103 upgrade with ported heads, bigger valves, flat top pistons, Andrews 54H cams, billet support plate, really nice upgrade, LOVE IT!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
21, 96, andrews, cam, cfm, charts, donnie, exhaust, harley, horsepower, joe, minton, motor, peterson, recommendation, rinehart, torque, tw, xwing


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising
Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0