You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join HDForums.com community today!
consultjdm,
Does it feel "fast" now? Is it a large difference or is it subtle? I already have SE203 cams and a bore job, but I want more. I really want to do the whole Head Quarters kit, but I can't afford it right now, so I am considering just going with their bolt in cam (HQ0034G) and gear drives... maybe change to 3.37 drive ratio too. I'm busy spending the money on tires, suspension, and brake upgradesto harness the power before I go nuts with the engine.
__________________
-05 Deluxe 95" 203 cams thunderheader
hand tooled leather seat and grips
-94 Sportster rigid jockey
It probably feels a lot like yours. The woods' cams claim to give the low end torque sooner. With a head kit it would be real fast. The main thing is how smooth it pulls hard with a gradual small twist of the throttle.
It has pleanty of power for two up riding.
Good Idea to get all the suspension and braking in tip top shape.
I just added the panacea light system to my bike to help with safety.
RE: 95 or 98 ci kit
