Woods Cams or SE ?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Oct 22, 2009 | 12:01 PM

#11

red devil

Outstanding HDF Member

Joined: Sep 2008

Posts: 2,408

Likes: 1

From: pottsville,pa

Quote:

Originally Posted by Desert Hog

On his dyno sheet the torque is in Newtom meters but we are normally looking Foot pounds. 116 Newton meters = 85 Foot pounds. (To convert NM to Ft Lbs multiply the NM by 1.3558. 116x1.3558=85)

I learned something new today! Thanks for clearing that up Desert Hog.

Oct 22, 2009 | 01:33 PM

#12

CRF

Outstanding HDF Member

Joined: Jul 2007

Posts: 2,306

Likes: 3

From: Vancouver, BC

Quote:

Originally Posted by Desert Hog

On his dyno sheet the torque is in Newtom meters but we are normally looking Foot pounds. 116 Newton meters = 85 Foot pounds. (To convert NM to Ft Lbs multiply the NM by 1.3558. 116x1.3558=85)

ummmmm 116 X 1.3558 doesn't = 85.........it equals 157.2728

Just sayin..........

Oct 22, 2009 | 04:24 PM

#13

thedonthere

Outstanding HDF Member

Joined: Dec 2008

Posts: 2,419

Likes: 1

From: Ashland Ore.

116 divided by 1.3558 does

Oct 22, 2009 | 08:06 PM

#14

BlueBobber07

Advanced

Joined: Dec 2008

Posts: 80

Likes: 0

I had the same thoughts about cams. I ended up going with the 204's. Only other changes to the bike are V&H BBS pipes, stage I aircleaner, PC III and the Andrews 30 tooth drive pulley. Bike dyno'd 91 hp and 98 ft lbs. I now there's better and faster out there but I'm very pleased.