When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I love HD heritage and image and style, and love my big twin for crusin'. But if I was going to blow another $10+k on another bike just for "performance", I'd be headed to the BMW dealer, no question. BMW, as with their cars, in many ways sets the benchmark in the targeted demographic & use they build for.
Isn't the point of reviewing seemingly "different" machines to evaluate how each might be suited to the intended use? If HD is gonna market this new ride as a "performance bike", then anyone who's into "performance" might want to evaluate ALL the comparables before investing, right?
I love HD heritage and image and style, and love my big twin for crusin'. But if I was going to blow another $10+k on another bike just for "performance", I'd be headed to the BMW dealer, no question. BMW, as with their cars, in many ways sets the benchmark in the targeted demographic & use they build for.
No where does HD promote the XR as a "performance" bike...
I don't see why these comparisons continue. If you're going to compare something at least try to get something similar. It's like an auto forum running comparisons between a Saturn and a Ferrari.
look man richard simmons is in better condition than dennis leary, but that dont make me wanna have beers with him over leary. the bmw is a better performance bike thats kinda gay an really directed towards **** yuppies so i'd never want any part of it. the XR1200 is no performance slouch, looks tough, has the harley sound and chicks dig em so i say the XR1200 doesn't just compete with the bmw it kicks it *** all day long.
Last edited by ernofsteel007; Jun 21, 2009 at 09:35 PM.
lol...I agree. I believe they are saying it's the type of performance bike you would have ridden a "half century ago". Certainly not today! Cool bike nonetheless! As with all H-D's, top line performance is not what the bikes are about.
Originally Posted by tiger_rider
True, except that bit where it says "a half century ago".
There was a bike magazine article a couple of weeks ago where they compared the XR and a Ducati Biposto. Probably one of the better comparisons
Edit. It was the July issue of Cycle World and the Ducati was the Sport 1000
Own a K1200R and a 09 CVO softail, drove the XR1200, lovely bike, the review in question is an unfair comparison but makes me wonder why im thinking of trading in the Beemer for the 2010 XR1200x
Slideshow: Jason Momoa's latest restoration project blends 1920s Harley-Davidsons with modern electric technology, creating some of the most unusual hybrid motorcycles ever built.
Harley-Davidson Fat Boy Becomes a Dark, Decepticon-Inspired Custom
Slideshow: Killer Custom's latest build relies on styling changes rather than performance upgrades, giving the cruiser an entirely different personality.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.